Pictures of a transit people mover, traffic on a freeway, a car on rural highway, a family using the phone, and and airplane flying over a toll plaza.

511
America's Travel
Information Number


Implementation
Guidelines for Launching
511 Services


511 Logo with Travel Info

Version 1.1
June 2002


Published by the 511 Deployment Coalition

This document also available for downloading as a Microsoft® Word file (6.94 Mbytes)
or an Adobe Acrobat PDF file (0.99 Mbytes).

Association logos for AASHTO, APTA, ITS America, and USDOT


Transmittal Letter from 511 Deployment Coalition. Click or select for text of letter.


Table of Contents

Executive Summary

I. Introduction

     A. 511 Deployment Coalition Program

     B. Purpose of the Guidelines

     C. 511 Vision: Empowering the "Informed Traveler"

II. Content Guidelines

     A. Basic Content Guidelines

          i. Highway Content

          ii. Public Transportation Content

     B. Example of a Basic 511 System

     C. Optional Content

III. Consistency Guidelines

IV. Monitoring and Updating the Guidelines

V. Additional Issues

VI. Additional Resources

     A. Deployment Assistance Reports

     B. Educational Materials

     C. 511 Marketing Toolkit

     D. Internet Resources

Appendix A – 511 Deployment Coalition Policy Committee and Working Group Rosters

 


Executive Summary

In July 2000, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designated 511 as the United States’ national traveler information telephone number. The FCC ruling leaves nearly all implementation issues and schedules to state and local agencies and telecommunications carriers. In 2005,the FCC will review our progress in implementing 511.

In early 2001, mindful of both the opportunity and challenge that 511 presents, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), in conjunction with many other organizations including the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) and the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America), with the support of the U.S. Department of Transportation, established the 511 Deployment Coalition (Coalition). An executive-level Policy Committee and a supporting Working Group were established to conduct the work of the Coalition. Membership of the Coalition draws from all levels and types of government agencies, various segments of the telecommunications industry and the fields of consulting, system integration and information service provision.

The Coalition has established as its goal "the timely establishment of a national 511 traveler information service available to a majority of Americans by 2005 that is sustainable and provides value to users." The Coalition recognizes that 511 services will be developed in a bottom-up fashion with state and local transportation agencies establishing services in areas and timeframes determined by them. The Coalition has developed this document, "Implementation Guidelines for Launching 511 Services," to assist implementers in their efforts to develop quality systems and to lay the foundation for ultimately establishing a consistent nationwide 511 service.

These guidelines are designated as Version 1.1 and represent a thoughtful update of the original Implementation Guidelines published in November 2001. The Coalition recognizes that these guidelines are needed and desired as soon as possible by implementers to establish systems that adhere to these guidelines. However, until practical experience is gained through deployment and use, some areas of these guidelines may require modification or clarification. The Coalition plans to continue monitoring and reviewing the guidelines, producing updates as warranted.

An important message to implementers is that their initial 511 service should be continually improved - their 511 launch service should not be viewed as their mature 511 service. The Coalition intends to improve and expand these guidelines as implementers collectively march towards mature systems.

The guidelines focus on two main areas - service content and service consistency.

Content Guidelines

Several categories of information, or "content," are candidates to be provided via a 511 service. The overriding philosophy of the content guidelines is that there are two types of content levels:

  1. Basic content – Content that every 511 system should have. Basic content is the focus of these guidelines.

  2. Optional content – Additional content beyond basic content provided by a 511 service.  Optional content is up to the discretion of the system implementers and may include additional content supported by the public sector and/or private sector supported services.

These guidelines recommend that every 511 system deployed in the U.S. should provide at minimum the basic content as defined in this document. It is this basic content that callers will associate as the core of 511.

Basic content comes in two general categories:

  1. Highway - Information associated with particular roadways in a 511 service area.
  2. Public Transportation – Information associated with transit services (bus, rail, etc.) in a 511 service area.

The guidelines describe in detail the types of basic highway and public transportation-related content and also discuss the importance of content quality.

Consistency Guidelines

511 service consistency is important from the perspective of both callers and the FCC. To provide implementers a blueprint as to what they can do to maximize service consistency, the 511 Deployment Coalition has developed guidelines in 15 areas:

  1. User Interface
  2. Initial Greeting
  3. Commercial Advertising and Sponsorship
  4. Fee Notification of Premium Services
  5. Multi-lingual Capabilities
  6. Time stamping of Information
  7. System Access Quality
  8. Hours of System Operation
  9. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Implementation
  10. Environmental Justice
  11. Use of Standards
  12. Privacy
  13. 911 Linkage
  14. 511 Branding
  15. Number Allocation and Service Coordination

Though not completed at this time, the Coalition continues to examine and consider developing guidelines in the area of inter-regional interoperability.

Key Changes from Version 1.0

Version 1.0 of the guidelines was posted on the websites of the partner organizations in November 2001 and comments were solicited for a period of time. This resulted in 56 comments from 6 organizations that suggested edits and asked for clarification on various components of the guidelines.  A comments database was compiled and representatives from the partner organizations and the working group discussed each comment submitted.  The discussion led to development of this Version 1.1 of the guidelines and each comment was addressed either by revisions to the guidelines or "no action" based on the collective wisdom of the comment review team.

In the Consistency Guidelines, Section 2, System Considerations, item 2.7 911 Linkage was modified based on the efforts of a special task force of the working group led by Bill Jones of ITS JPO. This multi-disciplinary group was given the mission to further explore transferring 511 calls to 911 emergency response and all the implications that would entail. Bill Jones presented the sub-group’s findings to the Policy Committee on March 1, 2002. The Policy Committee decided that while it is technically feasible to transfer a call made to 511 to a 911 call center, implementers should examine a number of key issues that must be considered before choosing to do so. Any region considering this capability must research the liability and privacy issues associated with 911 call processing. The liability protection currently offered to the telecommunications industry and 911 call center operators does not apply to transportation agencies or their contractors. Also, there would be both non-recurring and recurring costs to the implementer of this capability. To assist 511 implementers, the special task force completed "Deployment Assistance Report #2: Transfer of 511 Calls to 911" which is available at http://www.its.dot.gov/511/511to911.htm.

The Coalition also published "Deployment Assistance Report #1: Business Models and Cost Considerations" which was the result of the efforts of a subgroup of the working group led by Todd Kell of VDOT and Melanie Crotty of the MTC.  The full report that covers issues salient for migrating a planned or existing traveler information service to utilize the 511 dialing code is available at http://www.its.dot.gov/511/511_Costs.htm.

Additional Resources

Information on the 511 Deployment Coalition, including deployment assistance reports, educational materials, a marketing toolkit and supporting resource materials, and additional useful references for 511 implementers may be found at the following web sites:


I.     Introduction

On March 8, 1999, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) petitioned the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to designate a nationwide three-digit telephone number for traveler information. On July 21, 2000, the FCC designated 511 as the national traveler information number.

The FCC ruling leaves nearly all implementation issues and schedules to state and local agencies and telecommunications carriers. There are no Federal requirements and no mandated way to pay for 511.  Consistent with the national designation of 511, the FCC expects that the transportation industry will provide the traveling public with a quality service that has a degree of uniformity across the country.  In 2005,the FCC will review progress in implementing 511.

While the flexibility provided in the FCC ruling is highly desirable, it also presents a challenge.  Although there is a great deal of interest in using 511 throughout the U.S., if not thoughtfully planned, 511 services could devolve into an inconsistent set of services widely varying in type, quality and cost.

A.  511 Deployment Coalition Program

Mindful of both the opportunity and challenge that 511 presents, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), in conjunction with many other organizations including the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) and the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America), with the support of the U.S. Department of Transportation, has established a 511 Deployment Coalition.

The goal of the 511 Deployment Coalition is "the timely establishment of a national 511 traveler information service available to a majority of Americans by 2005 that is sustainable and provides value to users." The intent is to implement 511 nationally using a bottom-up approach facilitated by information sharing and a cooperative dialogue through the national associations represented on the Policy Committee, the governing body of this program. The mission of the Policy Committee is to provide guidance on how to achieve this goal.

The 511 Deployment Coalition has developed guidelines on what information should be provided by a basic 511 service (content) and the degree of uniformity and consistency of that service across the country (consistency). A Working Group of managers involved in 511 and traveler information service delivery has been supporting the Policy Committee. The Working Group has studied extensively existing telephone-based traveler information systems and the projected technological, political and economic environments in the near future to develop recommendations for guidelines (see http://www.its.dot.gov/511/511.htm for materials developed or used by the Working Group and Policy Committee in its deliberations). Appendix A contains the rosters of the Policy Committee and the Working Group.

This document provides guidance on 511 content and consistency to implementers.

B.  Purpose of the Guidelines

The 511 Deployment Coalition recognizes that 511 services will be developed in a bottom-up fashion with state and local transportation agencies - with the close collaboration of the private sector - establishing services in areas and timeframes determined by them. The positive benefits of this approach are that it enables resources from many organizations to be harnessed to deploy 511 as well as providing many opportunities for innovation in 511 service delivery. A potential negative consequence of simultaneous independent actions is that the resulting services do not, from a caller’s or national policy perspective, resemble a well-planned consistent service.

To reduce the chances of service confusion and inconsistency, the 511 Deployment Coalition is establishing guidelines in the areas of content and consistency. 511 service consistency will be established through implementers following these guidelines, and as an increasing number of services are established, a national 511 service will emerge.

The 511 Deployment Coalition is very cognizant of the reality that if quality systems do not develop, the transportation industry may lose the privilege of the exclusive use of the 511 number. On the other hand, if guidelines suggest services that are cost-prohibitive and unsupportable, the result could be few operating systems, also leading to losing the privilege of the number. Thus, these guidelines are designed from a customer-centric viewpoint while being sensitive to the issues of those agencies that must gather and prepare information and manage information service provision.

The transportation industry has been afforded a tremendous opportunity to better serve its customers. The purpose of these guidelines is to assist transportation agencies in establishing this customer service in the best possible manner. The Coalition and its member organizations strongly recommend that implementers carefully review and consider these guidelines in their implementation planning.

C.  511 Vision: Empowering the "Informed Traveler"

The 511 traveler information system will deliver the information that a traveler wants, at the time and location that he or she wants it. The systems will empower travelers to make better decisions, benefiting both the traveler and the transportation network and society at large. The vision of 511 is to serve as the principal telephonic interface for providing this information to travelers.

In an environment of rapidly changing technology and consumer tastes and needs, precisely pinpointing what a "mature" 511 system is would be nearly impossible. However, key characteristics of successful mature systems will likely include:

511 will be "mature" when travelers consider 511 to be a single integrated system - their voice portal to traveler information. An analogy is the Internet. Although it is comprised of millions of independent and interconnected sites, the public views it as a single system - "the Internet."

These "launch" guidelines are intended to aid implementers in establishing initial 511 services. Mature 511 systems will evolve from launch versions, with continuous improvements in areas such as:

An important message to implementers is that their initial 511 service should be continually improved - their 511 launch service should not be viewed as their mature 511 service. The Coalition intends to improve and expand these guidelines as implementers collectively march towards mature systems.


II.    Content Guidelines

Several categories of information, or "content," are candidates to be provided via a 511 service. Some of these content categories are typical of what is offered through phone systems in operation today. Other categories are extensions into additional public sector services, while others are the likely domains of private service providers. All of these content categories have been examined and considered in developing the guidelines.

The overriding philosophy of the content guidelines is that there are two types of content levels:

  1. Basic content - Content that every 511 system should have. Basic content is the focus of these guidelines.
  2. Optional content - Additional content beyond basic content provided by a 511 service. Optional content is up to the discretion of the system implementers and can include additional content supported by the public sector and/or private sector supported services. Section C will provide a summary of some possible optional content categories.

In addition, the guidelines include "implementation recommendations" addressing content topics that have been demonstrated to provide value to callers, but are recognized as difficult to uniformly implement. Therefore, while not explicitly part of the basic content package, these levels of content are recommended as part of 511 systems as they are developed and designed, if possible.

These guidelines recommend that every 511 system deployed in the U.S. should provide at minimum the basic content as defined in this document. It is this basic content that callers will associate as the core of 511.

 

A.  Basic Content Guidelines

Basic content comes in two general categories:

  1. Highway - Information associated with particular roadways in a 511 service area.
  2. Public Transportation - Information associated with transit services (bus, rail, etc.) in a 511 service area.

In each of these content categories, the guidelines provide general principles or philosophies and specific guidance on the type of information that should be provided to callers.

Note that a key concept in 511 service planning is that 511 services must be designed to provide information beyond a single agency, mode or content type.

i.  Highway Content

As the majority of travel in the United States uses highways, information about major roadways should be a principal part of a 511 system. The core of many existing telephone-based traveler information services is highway conditions reporting. As these systems migrate to 511 access and new systems are established, the following guidance should be considered.

Principles

  1. Content is route/corridor-based - 511 services should provide information that is retrievable by route number and/or name. In certain circumstances, if one or more principal roads run parallel, it may be acceptable to provide information on a corridor-basis. However, providing information on major roadways on a broad geographic basis (e.g. "roads in the Northwest portion of the state will be...") is not recommended. When a route/corridor is operated by multiple agencies, these agencies should work together to provide an integrated description of conditions.
  2. Limited access roadways and the National Highway System should be the basis for basic 511 highway/roadway-related content - With 40% of the nation’s travel, including 75% of truck traffic and 90% of tourist traffic, the 160,000 mile National Highway System should be the focus of basic 511 content. Limited access roadways that are not part of the NHS, likely to exist in urban areas, should also be part of the basic content. (State-by-state maps of the National Highway System can be found at www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep10/data/data.html).
  3. More detail needed in urban areas - Given the increased traffic volumes and congestion levels in urban areas, even minor events could have large impacts to travel.  Thus, greater content detail is recommended in urban areas.
  4. Content is automated - Whether the information provided to the caller is a human recorded message, synthesized or digitized speech, the information is stored and automatically provided to callers. There is no direct contact between callers and human operators to provide basic highway content.

Figure 1: Routes, Segements, and Content serve as key descriptors for Highway content.Guidelines
The fundamental structure of a telephone system design matches highways very well. Telephone systems are usually accessed through a "menu tree" that is navigated by voice commands or by touching a phone’s keypad.  Eventually, a caller reaches their desired destination in the system and either gets a recorded or digitized voice message. When seeking highway information, a caller will first find the specific highway or corridor for which they desire information. The caller will then find the specific segment of highway or corridor they are interested in, if it is a lengthy road. Once the 511 service knows the specific section of highway the caller is interested in, it then provides the caller a report of the relevant basic content. This process is graphically illustrated in Figure 1, with "routes," "segments" and "content" serving as the key descriptors of the content guidelines.

  1. Routes/Corridors - Information on all National Highway System facilities/corridors should be available to callers. In urban areas, information on all non-NHS limited access highways should also be available to callers.
  2. Segments - In non-urban areas, long routes should be sub-divided into segments. Segment specification is left to the implementer, but should follow logic with segments defined between major towns, landmarks or roadways. In urban areas, segments should be defined between major interchanges and will generally be smaller in length than non-urban segments.
  3. Figure 2 provides a possible example of segmentation, where I-10 in Arizona contains urban and non-urban segments.

    Map of NHS routes in Arizona showing examples of segmenting I-10 between major towns and within Phoenix.

  4. Content - For each segment, specific types of content should be provided. In non-urban areas, information should include:
  5. For each of these highway content types, it is necessary to provide details that enable callers to assess travel conditions and make travel decisions associated with a route segment. Table 1 illustrates the detailed information needed for each content type.

    Table 1: Basic Content Detail Needed for Each Highway Content Type. Click or select for text of table.

Content Quality
In an increasingly advanced information society, callers are generally accustomed to high quality information. 511 content must be no different. Specifically, 511 implementers must focus on the following quality parameters:

Information quality is a major concern for the 511 Deployment Coalition. The quality of basic content information will largely determine the success of 511. 511 services should give callers the ability to gauge the quality of the reported information to enable them to properly weigh the information in their decision-making (e.g. "there is a report of an avalanche..." vs. "an avalanche has occurred..."). However, the Coalition has not included specific quality parameters as part of this version of the guidelines. This is for two reasons:

  1. More collective deployment experience and user feedback is needed prior to determining optimal quality parameters.
  2. The Coalition hopes that a special focus on information quality by implementers will lead to quality services.

In future updates to the guidelines, specific quality parameters may be added.

Implementation Recommendations
The following "implementation recommendations" address content topics that have been demonstrated to provide value to callers, but are recognized as difficult to uniformly implement. Thus, providing the following content is recommended to be included in launch services if possible, but not explicitly part of the basic content package for highways. As services improve and evolve towards the long-range vision, these items should be incorporated into the service if not done so at the outset.

ii.  Public Transportation Content

Regardless of the size and nature of a 511 service area, there are likely to be one or more public transportation service providers in operation. In many cases, these public transportation operators already have established methods of communicating to the public about their services, including web sites and customer service centers accessible by telephone. If properly utilized and coordinated with these existing communications methods, 511 can assist public transportation operators in better serving their customers and possibly even attract new customers. The following guidelines should be considered when developing the public transportation information component of a 511 service.

There are many different approaches public transportation operators could take to implement their portion of 511 services. These guidelines are intended to maintain this implementation flexibility.

Principles
Information access via telephone has proven to be extremely important in transit customer service. The principal purposes for these services are for general agency and service information, communicating service disruptions and changes, and trip planning.

At the basic content level, 511 can assist in providing callers with general agency and service information, and communicating service disruptions and changes. Also, callers could be directed to where they may obtain more detailed information and trip planning.

The following basic principles should be followed:

  1. Information on all public transportation agencies in a 511 service area should be accessible - Often, one or two dominant public transportation agencies exist in an area, but many more exist that collectively provide a region’s public transportation system. All of these operators should be accessible via 511. In complex or large geographic areas, it may be necessary to subdivide areas before identifying specific agencies (e.g., the San Francisco Bay area currently uses five sub-regions).
  2. 511 works in conjunction with existing public transportation customer service centers accessible by telephone - 511 is not intended to replace these operations, but to provide compatible and supplemental information. Further, the vision is that callers would have direct access to customer service centers via 511.
  3. 511 systems should attempt to minimize overload on public transportation customer services centers – Collective wisdom is that 511 access could increase the number of callers seeking public transportation information. If 511 were merely designed as a shorter number to access the service center, this could significantly increase total calls to the customer service center. However, 511 systems can and should be designed to provide automated messages described in these guidelines that will answer many callers’ questions prior to seeking assistance from customer service center operators. Ideally, clever design will reduce the number of calls to be fielded by operators, while increasing the total number of calls successfully managed.
  4. Each agency is responsible for their information - To ensure information quality and agency autonomy, any information provided via 511 for a particular public transportation operator must be provided or quality-checked by that operator. Agency specific information will be perceived by callers as coming from that agency, thus the agency must either directly provide or ensure the accuracy of the information.

Guidelines Figure 3: Geographic Sub-areas, Agencies, and Content serve as key descriptors for Public Transportation content.
The fundamental structure of a telephone system design matches public transportation operations. Telephone systems are usually accessed through a "menu tree" that is navigated by voice commands or by touching a phone’s keypad. Eventually, a caller reaches their desired destination in the system and gets either a recorded or digitized voice message or possibly a live operator. When seeking transit information, a caller will first find the specific agency that operates the service for which they desire information. In complex or large areas, the 511 service area may be segmented in sub-areas to simplify agency identification. Once the 511 service knows the specific public transportation agency the caller is interested in, it then provides the caller a report of the relevant basic content. This process is graphically illustrated in Figure 3, with "geographic sub-area," "agency" and "content" serving as the key descriptors of the content guidelines.

  1. Geographic Sub-area – In large or complex 511 service areas, the service area can be subdivided for navigating and providing transit reports. This subdivision should be developed locally and represent logical characterization of the service area, such as by travel corridor, geography (e.g., "the northwest suburbs" the "southeastern part of the state") or common name or nickname of a given sub-region (e.g., "Long Island"). Of course, 511 services that utilize sub-areas in their menu will require callers to make at least two navigating commands to select their agency, thus care should be taken so callers can reach their desired report as swiftly as possible.
  2. Agency – Each agency that provides public transportation services in the 511 service area or sub-area should be accessible. A single report for each agency is the basic guideline. Agencies have the option to add more layers and depth to their content. For public transportation agencies with large or complex operations, a single automated report may either be too long and cumbersome or potentially confusing for callers. Therefore, basic content as described in the following section should be provided in a logically segmented fashion (e.g., by mode or by region).
  3. Content – For each public transportation agency, the 511 system should have at least a single automated report that provides:

Content Quality
In an increasingly advanced information society, callers are generally accustomed to high quality information. 511 content must be no different. Specifically, 511 implementers must focus on the following quality parameters:

Information quality is a major concern to the 511 Deployment Coalition. The quality of basic content information will largely determine the success of 511. 511 services should give callers the ability to gauge the quality of the reported information to enable them to properly weigh the information in their decision-making (e.g. "there is an unconfirmed report of delays on bus routes 7, 12, and 15..." vs. "because of a street blockage on Maple, bus routes 7, 12, and 15 are experiencing delays..."). However, the Coalition has not included specific quality parameters as part of this version of the guidelines. This is for two reasons:

  1. More collective deployment experience and user feedback is needed prior to determining optimal quality parameters.
  2. The Coalition hopes that a special focus on information quality by implementers will lead to quality services.

In future updates to the guidelines, specific quality parameters may be added.

Implementation Recommendation
The following "implementation recommendation" addresses a content topic that has been demonstrated to provide value to callers, but is recognized as difficult to uniformly implement. Thus, providing the following content is recommended if possible, but not explicitly part of the basic content package for public transportation.

 

B.  Example of a Basic 511 System

To illustrate how a "basic" 511 system could operate, the following example is provided. This example, based upon a fictitious implementation in the State of "East Dakota," is for illustrative purposes only. It was not intended to guide user interface designs. It is provided to illustrate the nature of "basic" content. Figure 4 provides a logical progression through both the public transportation and highway content until each reaches an automated report.

Figure 4: Example of a Basic 511 Call. Click or select for text of figure.

 

C.  Optional Content

As indicated, the 511 Deployment Coalition recognizes that additional content beyond the basic content described in the previous section could be provided by a 511 service. In fact, the Coalition encourages, so long as quality basic content is being provided, that 511 implementers consider providing optional content that will benefit callers.

Again, this optional content is up to the discretion of the system implementers and can include additional content supported by the public sector and/or private sector supported services. Based on local demographics or geography, some of these optional content categories would be expected by local callers. Implementers should factor in this expectation in their service planning process.

In providing additional content implementers have essentially two choices:

  1. Go Deeper – A richer set of basic services could be provided via 511. For example, information on more highway routes, such as major arterials, could be added to the basic system. Or more detailed content could be provided on public transportation services (e.g., detailed choices for automated messages could be provided – service disruptions may be a different selection than parking availability at a rail station for instance – as opposed to a single automated message). Another possibility is that an agency or region could choose to greatly improve the accuracy, timeliness or availability of their information, improving its quality but not adding further content.
  2. Go Broader – Many additional content categories have been considered for inclusion in 511 services, but are not part of the basic content package. The following list is representative, but not exhaustive, of the possible optional content categories. Implementers may choose to implement these and other types of content (Please note that the 511 Deployment Coalition is not assessing the merits of each of these content options, merely providing them for the readers consideration):

In examining the addition of optional content, system implementers should be careful to design a system that complements – rather than diminishes – the impact of the basic content services. Also, each of the options listed above may require extra and complex interactions to provide via 511. As these are intended to be illustrative examples, assessments of the relative practicality or merits of each optional content category are not provided.


III.   Consistency Guidelines

511 service consistency is important for at least two reasons:

  1. In its order, the FCC "encourage[s] federal, state, and local government transportation agencies to work cooperatively to ensure that the transportation information provided using 511 is appropriate to the national scope of our designation and the scarcity of the N11 public resource." In other words, the FCC expects the transportation industry to deliver a consistent 511 service nationally.
  2. With the possibility for the first time of dialing the same number for information in multiple regions, consumers could expect similar service in regions served by different systems. In fact, the traveling public is likely to be completely unaware that 511 services are separate systems. In other words, callers will likely expect and even demand consistency of 511 services.

To provide implementers a blueprint as to what they can do to maximize service consistency, the 511 Deployment Coalition has developed these Consistency Guidelines. These guidelines represent the culmination of a process nearly a year long and have been developed based on a philosophy of providing flexibility to implementers at this early stage while ensuring that callers will recognize the services as part of a national system. But the need for the "look and feel" of basic 511 services to be the same no matter where a customer accesses the service is of utmost importance.

These guidelines are written to balance these twin desires of implementation flexibility and consistent caller experience.

Sixteen issues, have been identified and grouped into two logical categories: What the Caller Hears and System Considerations.

In this section each issue will be briefly described and the recommended guidance will be provided. To support establishing version 1.0 of these guidelines, short background papers were developed for each issue describing the issue, the options and the rationale for the guideline further, as well as providing or referencing additional supporting information. These papers may be found online at http://www.its.dot.gov/511/511.htm.

1.  What the Caller Hears

1.1. User Interface
Issue: The ease and methods of access that callers have to desired information once a call is initiated.
Guideline: Implementers are encouraged to use voice recognition as the primary user interface.  For voice activated systems, the following top-level commands should be used when a system has the relevant information available (this is based upon the current draft content guidelines): "Highway Information," "Transit Information," "Airport Information," "Rail Station Information" and "Ferry Information." Top-level menu commands beyond the basic services are acceptable. Care should be taken when adding additional top-level commands to select descriptive terms and not to conflict with the basic terms noted here.

Although discouraged as a primary user interface means, systems that utilize keypad entry for navigation should use the following top-level menu tree: 1 for "highway information," 2 for "transit information" and 9 for "help using the system." Although not defined as part of the basic content package, 3 should be reserved for "airport and other major terminal and transportation facility information." Systems that use both keypad entry and voice activation should allow callers to press or say the top-level number ("press or say 2 for transit information").

Overly complicated menu trees should be avoided. Systems should not require the user to make more than 3 entries or replies before providing the desired information. At each level, no more than 6 options should be listed. Systems should allow users to request messages be repeated and to "go back" in the menu tree.

"Shortcuts" are used often by repeat callers who know what element of information they are seeking. The use of shortcuts is encouraged. It is possible that a future update of these guidelines could include specific guidance on shortcut methods, but no detailed guidance is given at present.

1.2. Initial Greeting
Issue: What the caller hears upon starting a call.
Guideline: Based on focus groups, the initial greeting should be very short, such as "Welcome to (metro area's, state's, or program name's) 511 for Travel Information." Customers expect a short verification that they dialed correctly, but comment that they do not want a lengthy introduction or long formal enunciation of agency names. Supplemental information such as website addresses or complete help instructions should not be included in the initial greeting but provided through menu selections. In the cases of major emergencies, an emergency message may be provided prior to or in place of the normal initial greeting.

1.3. Commercial Advertising and Sponsorship
Issue: The parameters that should be used when a 511 service includes commercial advertising and/or sponsorship.
Guideline: Commercial advertising and sponsorship of 511 services, either in an initial greeting or in conjunction with a specific element, such as a message or content category heading, of a 511 service is acceptable. However, care should be given to ensure that the length of advertising messages does not overly inconvenience callers and that the content of these messages are consistent with the public service nature of 511. This guidance applies to the initial greeting and messages prior to the caller getting the information that they are seeking.

1.4. Fee Notification of Premium Services
Issue: Informing callers when they are seeking fee-based information or services.
Guideline: If a 511 service offers premium content – content beyond the basic content – options for accessing this content should be provided after basic content access options. If offered for a fee, callers must be informed when they have selected a premium content or service and what the cost of the content or service is prior to usage. Callers must opt-in before charges are incurred.

1.5. Multi-lingual Capabilities
Issue: Access to 511 services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) callers.
Guideline: 511 Implementers should review Executive Order 13166, signed by President Clinton on August 11, 2000 and the supporting "Guidance to Recipients on Special Language Service to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Beneficiaries" issued by U.S. DOT on January 22, 2001 to determine its applicability.

1.6. Time Stamping of Information
Issue: Providing a time/date identifier to provide callers with a sense of reliability and accuracy of the information provided.
Guideline: Caller expectations are for timely information. If a 511 system provides basic content quality as defined in the content guidelines, then time stamping the information is unnecessary and undesirable. If a system knowingly provides information that is updated not as conditions change, but based upon a periodic schedule, then the schedule should be communicated to callers in association with the particular message.

2.  System Considerations

2.1. System Access Quality
Issue: The ability of the telephone system to reliably and quickly answer calls.
Guideline: 511 systems should be sized to accept all calls for the 90th percentile peak hour load [1]. If live operators are utilized or connected to as part of a 511 service, 90th percentile wait time should not exceed 90 seconds, and callers should receive indications that they are on hold. 511 services should have an availability to callers of 99.8% (out of service less than 18 hours a year). System performance against these parameters should be measured and monitored.

2.2. Hours of System Operation
Issue: The days and hours that 511 service should be available to callers.
Guideline: 511 systems should be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. It is recognized that systems will not always be "operated" 24/7. In instances when the system is providing static, pre-recorded messages, systems should inform the caller that it is outside normal operating hours.

2.3. ADA Implementation
Issue: Complying with accessibility laws and regulations.
Guideline: 511 implementers need to consider that under Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, carriers and equipment manufacturers must provide access to and make their services and products usable by individuals with disabilities, "if readily achievable." Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits public entities (states, local governments, and any department, agency, or other instrumentality of state or local government) from discriminating against those with disabilities in all services that they provide to the public. 511 implementers should include in their design plans how they intend to provide access to these services to the disabled community, such as through the carriers’ existing TRS or TDD capabilities.

2.4. Environmental Justice
Issue: The relationship of 511 and environmental justice principles that prevent discrimination against minority and low-income populations.
Guideline: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and a 1994 Presidential Executive Order address the Federal government’s responsibilities to assure that programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance adhere to environmental justice principles that prevent discrimination against minority and low-income populations. 511 services that use Federal funds must adhere to these rules.

2.5. Standards
Issue: 511 and National ITS standards.
Guideline: Significant resources have been invested to develop ITS standards that will simplify and expedite the deployment of interoperable systems. 511 implementers should review the full range of standards available and consider using those that will aid in cost-effective system development and/or inter-system interoperability.

2.6. Privacy
Issue: Privacy protections for callers.
Guideline: 511 services should adhere to ITS America’s Fair Information and Privacy Principles.

2.7. 911 Linkage
Issue: Relationship of 511 services to 911 services.
Guideline: While it is technically feasible to transfer a call made to 511 to a 911 call center, implementers should examine a number of key issues that must be considered before choosing to do so. Any region considering this capability must research the liability and privacy issues associated with 911 call processing. The liability protection currently offered the telecommunications industry and 911 call center operators does not apply to transportation agencies or their contractors. Also, there would be both non-recurring and recurring costs to the implementer of this capability. (See Section VI for more information on this subject.)

2.8. 511 Branding
Issue: The creation of a brand identity for 511 services to manage consumer expectations.
Guideline: The 511 designation is a brand like "Intel® inside." Local implementations of 511 should incorporate whatever collateral (greeting, logos, signage, etc.) the national effort develops in conjunction with the local ATIS brand that is being marketed. 511 callers must realize that the local 511 implementation is part of a national program with certain requirements for quality and content. Also, where appropriate, implementers should consider promoting alternate means of access to information that is available via 511, such as Internet websites.

2.9. Number Allocation and Service Coordination
Issue: Organizing and coordinating transportation agencies in a given region to determine what 511 services will be offered, by whom and in what geographic area(s).
Guideline: State Departments of Transportation should accept the lead facilitating role for planning how 511 services will evolve in their state. In this role, state DOTs should work closely and in partnership with other transportation operators in their state. State DOTs should also lead coordination efforts with the state’s public utilities or service commission. In regions where multi-state cooperation is logical, state DOTs should coordinate with one another so that service regions make sense to callers.

2.10. Inter-regional Interoperability
Issue: How 511 services interconnect.
Guideline: This issue has been flagged as a future issue, but one in which a guideline cannot be established at this time.


IV.   Monitoring and Updating the Guidelines

These consistency guidelines are designated as version 1.1 and have been published roughly six months after version 1.0 was released. The 511 Deployment Coalition recognizes that updates to the guidelines are needed and desired as soon as possible by implementers to establish systems that adhere to these guidelines. However, until more practical experience is gained through deployment and use, some areas of these guidelines – some things that are in the guidelines and some things that have been omitted – may require further modification or clarification.

The Deployment Coalition plans to continue to monitor and review the guidelines, producing updates as warranted.

If implementers have suggestions for improvements, please provide this information electronically to “511feedback@aashto.org”.


V.    Additional Issues

This section provides additional background information that may be of use to implementers when determining the content that a 511 system will provide. Though surely not exhaustive, these areas have been uncovered in the development of these guidelines as areas to consider:

  1. Usage Monitoring. Applications are commonly used in computer telephony systems to provide detailed and summary usage statistics. Implementers should consider employing such usage monitoring systems to obtain information about patterns of usage of different parts of the 511 system. This information may be used for many purposes, such as identifying high priority areas that must be maintained at the highest quality or identifying little used areas that may suggest either design flaws or information quality problems. Gathering usage data and continually assessing system performance based upon this data will go a long way toward ensuring that services meet caller needs.
  2. Standards. The ITS program has invested considerable resources in the development of national standards to facilitate the efficient exchange of information. Some of these standards, consistent with the national ITS architecture, could be quite beneficial to system implementers by reducing the time and resources required to share information between transportation management systems and the 511 support systems. Existing standards that should be examined include the ATIS and ATMS data dictionaries and several "business area standards" from the Transit Communications Interface Profiles (TCIP) family of standards. An example of how these standards can help is the ATIS Data Dictionary, which includes binary codes for over 1,500 types of highway event "descriptors." These codes could be programmed into both the management systems and 511 equipment and only binary codes would need to be transferred between systems to provide information necessary to create route-segment reports. This also has the benefit of largely standardizing the reports that callers hear, aiding their understanding of reported information. The central focal point for ITS standards information is http://www.its-standards.net/.
  3. Enabling feedback from callers. Some existing telephone systems have methods such as voice mailboxes that enable callers to provide feedback on the quality of the service and to offer suggested improvements. Implementers should consider incorporating such a feature into their 511 systems as it gives a direct feedback mechanism from callers. However, care should be taken to distinguish this service from the "Incident Reporting" optional content described in Section II.C, which would, where implemented, enable callers to provide real-time or near real-time condition reports to transportation managers.
  4. System Testing. Early implementers have found that system testing prior to live operation has significantly improved the initial utility – and customer satisfaction – for their system. These implementers have identified live testing by users, particularly of the user interface, as most critical. For voice recognition-based systems, it is recommended that testing include in an in-vehicle environment, both using a handset and in "hands-free" mode, to assess clarity and ease of navigation.

VI.   Additional Resources

Since the completion of the version 1.0 of the guidelines, several new reports and resources have been published by the Coalition or its sponsoring organizations. This section identifies key items that can be used as resources by implementers.

 

A.  Deployment Assistance Reports

The Coalition has published two Deployment Assistance Reports (DAR), with a third to be published shortly:

These reports resulted from focused efforts of Coalition volunteers. While in each case, these efforts were originated to support development of the guidelines, the Coalition members determined that much was learned in exploring each area that should be shared with the broader deployment community. Thus, each volunteer effort has concluded its activity by electronically publishing an information report. These reports are available on-line at the U.S. DOT website referenced below.

 

B.  Educational Materials

In March 2002, the 511 Deployment Coalition sponsored a national 511 deployment conference. The conference provided implementers the opportunity to learn about the Coalition’s progress as well as share implementation experience. The conference began with a four-hour 511 "101" introductory session. In addition, proceedings of the conference have been published electronically that include links to the presentations provided at the conference. The U.S. DOT and ITS America sites referenced below have links to the 511 "101" charts and the proceedings.

 

C.  511 Marketing Toolkit

Effective marketing of 511 is an essential element to successful 511 deployment. To assist implementers with this task, the 511 Deployment Coalition's Marketing and Outreach Program has made available an initial version of a toolkit of resources. We hope that these resources will help implementers plan more effective marketing programs, more efficiently, while promoting a "national brand" image for 511. The following marketing tools are currently available:

In addition to providing marketing tools, the Coalition's Marketing and Outreach Program supports implementers by promoting communication and networking. Through workshops and conference sessions, e-mail networks and conference calls, the program brings together the public information officers who are working to make the public aware of 511 service. The toolkit can be accessed at U.S. DOT’s site referenced below.

 

D.  Internet Resources

Information on the 511 Deployment Coalition, its supporting resource materials, and additional useful references for 511 implementers may be found at the following web sites:


Appendix A – 511 Deployment Coalition Policy Committee and Working Group Rosters

511 Deployment Coalition
Policy Committee
(As of May 22, 2002)

Frances Banerjee
General Manager
City of Los Angeles DOT
221 N. Figueroa St.
Suite 500
3rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
213-580-1182
Fax 213-580-1188
fbanerjee@dot.lacity.org

John Baniak
Executive Director
I-95 Corridor Coalition
77 Belmont Drive
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
518-584-4826
Fax 518-584-4827
jbaniak@nycap.rr.com

Thomas Brahms
Executive Director
Institute of Transportation Engineers
1099 14th Street, NW
Suite 300 West
Washington, DC 20005-3438
202-289-7722
Fax 202-289-0222
tbrahms@ite.org

James Codell, III
Secretary
Transportation Cabinet Dept. of Highways
State Office Building
501 High Street
Frankfort, KY 40622
502-564-4890
Fax 502-564-4809
jcodell@mail.kytc.state.ky.us

Kathryn Condello
Vice President, Industry Operations
Cellular Telecommun. Industry Assoc.
1250 Connecticut Avenue
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
202-736-3235
Fax 202-887-1629
Kcondello@ctia.org

Gregory Cook, Vice Chair
Executive Director
Ann Arbor Transportation Authority
2700 South Industrial Highway
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-677-3902
Fax 734-973-6338
gcook@theride.org

John L. Craig
Director
Nebraska Dept. of Roads
1500 Highway 2
Lincoln, NE 68502
402-479-4615
Fax 402-479-3758
jcraig@dor.state.ne.us

Robert P. Denaro
Sr. Vice President
Rand McNally and Company
8255 N. Central Park
Skokie, IL 60076-2970
847-275-8100
rpdenaro@aol.com

Ann Flemer
Deputy Director of Operations
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
510-817-3240
aflemer@mtc.ca.gov

Norm Forshee
911 Coordinator
St. Clair County
101 South 1st Street
Belleville, Illinois 62220
618-277-7316
Fax 618-277-7668
nforshee911@norcom2000.com

Steven Gayle
Executive Director
Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study
P.O. Box 1766
Government Plaza
Binghamton, NY 13902-1766
607-778-2443
sgayle@co.broome.ny.us

Robert C. Gibbons
Vice Chairman Board of Supervisors
County of Stafford
P.O. Box 339
1300 Courthouse Road
Stafford, VA 22555-0339
540-658-8607
Fax 540-752-1936
rgibbons@co.stafford.va.us

Honorable Chris Hart
County Commissioner
Hillsborough County
601 East Kennedy Blvd.
P. O. Box 1110
Tampa, FL 33601
813-272-5725
Fax 813-272-7052
hartc@hillsboroughcounty.org

George Heinrichs
President
Intrado, Inc.
6285 Lookout Road
Boulder, CO 80301
303-581-5605
Fax 303-581-0900
georgeh@intrado.com

Steve Heminger
Executive Director
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
510-464-7700
sheminger@mtc.ca.gov

Robert Hopkins
Managing Director, Administration
American Automobile Assoc.
Research & Development
1000 AAA Drive
Heathrow, FL 32746-5063
407-444-7660
Fax 407-444-7380
rhopkins@national.aaa.com

John Horsley
Executive Director
AASHTO
444 N. Capitol Street NW
Suite 249
Washington, DC 20001
202-624-5800
Fax 202-624-5808
jhorsley@aashto.org

Henry Hungerbeeler
Director
Missouri DOT
105 West Capitol Avenue
P. O. Box 270
Jefferson City, MO 65102
573-751-4622
Fax 573-526-5419
hungeh@mail.modot.state.mo.us

Randell H. Iwasaki
Director, District 4
Caltrans
111 Grand Avenue
P.O. Box 23660
Oakland, CA 94623-0660
510-286-4444
Randell_Iwasaki@dot.ca.gov

David Jannetta
President
Mobility Technologies
851 Duportail Road
Suite 220
Wayne, PA 19087
610-407-7410
Fax 610-725-0847
djannetta@traffic.com

Christine Johnson
Director, ITS Joint Program Office
Federal Highway Administration
400 7th Street, SW
Room 3401
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-0408
Fax 202-366-3302
Christine.johnson@fhwa.dot.gov

John LaMacchia
Chief Executive Officer
Tellme Networks, Inc.
1310 Villa Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650-930-9000
Fax 650-930-9101
johnlamacchia@tellme.com

Karen Lamb
Director of CSVC
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
8405 Colesville Road
Suite 500
5th Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20910
301-562-4690
Fax 301-562-4675
klamb@wmata.com

William Millar
President
American Public Transportation Association
1666 K Street, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20006
202-496-4820
Fax 202-496-4324
wmillar@apta.com

Robert L. Newbold
Deputy Director
Illinois DOT
2300 South Dirksen Parkway
Springfield, IL 62764
217-782-0699
Newboldrl@nt.dot.state.il.us

John Njord
Executive Director
Utah Department of Transportation
4501 South 2700 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
801-965-4028
Fax 801-965-4338
jnjord@dot.state.ut.us

Jeffrey F. Paniati
Program Manager, ITS Joint ProgramOffice
U.S. DOT/FHWA
400 7th Street SW
HOIT-1
RM 3401
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-9536
Fax 202-366-3302
Jeff.paniati@fhwa.dot.gov

John Porcari
Secretary
Maryland Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 8755
10 Elm Road
BWI Airport, MD 21240-0755
410-865-1000
Fax 410-865-1334
jporcari@mdot.state.md.us

Edwin Rowe
Senior Vice President, ITS
Iteris, Inc.
1515 S. Manchester Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92802-2907
714-780-7260
Fax 714-780-7246
ser@iteris.com

Neil Schuster
President
ITS America
400 Virginia Avenue SW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
202-484-2890
Fax 202-484-7081
nschuster@itsa.org

Alex Taft
Executive Director
AMPO
1700 K Street, NW
Suite 1300
Washington, DC 20006
202-367-0332
Fax 202-367-0330
ataft@ampo.org

Edward L. Thomas
Assoc. Administrator
FTA Research & Technology
400 Seventh Street SW
TRI-1
Room 9401
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4052
Fax 202-366-3765
edward.thomas@fta.dot.gov

Elwyn Tinklenberg, Chair
Commissioner
Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Blvd.
MS 100
Saint Paul, MN 55155-1899
651-296-3000
Fax 651-296-3587
Commissioner@dot.state.mn.us

Rose Travers
Director, Numbering Matters
United States Telecom Association
1401 H Street NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005
202-326-7296
Fax 202-326-7333
rtravers@usta.org

Harry W. Voccola
Senior Vice President
Navigation Technologies
97 McCutchen Court
Middletown, NJ 07748
908-804-5495
Fax 732-671-4349
voccola@navtech.com

Lawrence F. Yermack, Vice Chair
President
PB Farradyne
322 Tower Oaks Blvd.
Suite 200
Rockville, MD 20852
301-468-5568
Fax 301-816-1884
Yermack@pbworld.com


511 Deployment Coalition
Working Group
(As of May 22, 2002)

Patricia Babal
Navigation Technologies
11211 Waples Mill Rd.
Suite 210
Fairfax, VA 22030
703-359-0312
Fax 703-359-0315
babal@navtech.com

Ronald E. Boenau, P.E.
Chief, Advanced Public Transportation Systems Division
Federal Transit Administration
400 Seventh Street
SW, TRI-11
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-0195
Fax 202-366-3765
ronald.boenau@fta.dot.gov

Jeffrey Brummond
Senior Systems Architect
Iteris, Inc.
45472 Holiday Drive
Suite 8
Sterling, VA 20166-9457
703-925-3813
Fax 703-471-1757
jab@iteris.com

Tom Bulger
President
Government Relations, Inc.
1050 17th St. NW
Suite 510
Washington, DC 20036
202-775-0079
Fax 202-785-0477
Tbulger825@aol.com

Paul Cammack
Nebraska Dept. of Roads
3716 South 14th Street
Lincoln, NE 68509
402-471-1808
Fax 402-471-1814
pcammack@dor.state.ne.us

Bryan Chamberlain
ATIS Project Manager
Utah Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 141265
4501 South 2700 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-1265
801-965-4222
Fax 801-965-4073
bchamber@dot.state.ut.us

Sandra Check
Sr. Director, Cust. Serv. & Transit Information
New Jersey Transit Corporation
One Penn Plaza East
Newark, NJ 07105
201-491-7908
Fax 973-491-7408
scheck@njtransit.com

Pete Costello
Senior ITS Analyst
PBS&J
3859 Centerview Drive
Chantilly, VA 20151
703-471-7275
Fax 703-471-8021
petecostello@pbsj.com

Melanie M. Crotty
Manager, Transit Coordination & Access
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4700
510-817-3280
Fax 510-817-3299
mcrotty@mtc.ca.gov

Michael Doyle
Product Manager
Bell South
2180 Lake Blvd.
Suite 4A73
Atlanta, GA 30319
404-829-8493
Fax 404-829-8413
michael.doyle@bellsouth.com

Dave Ekern
Assistant Commissioner
Minnesota DOT
395 John Ireland Blvd.
MS 140
St. Paul, MN 55155
651-296-6884
Fax 651-282-2656
dave.ekern@dot.state.mn.us

David Fierro
V.P. Public Sector Business Development
SmartRoute Systems
10501 Mesa Lane
Clermont, FL 34711
617-494-8100
Fax 617-494-8186
dfierro@smartroute.com

Bob Fogel
National Association of Counties
440 First Street, NW
8th Floor
Washington, DC 20001
202-942-4236
Fax 202-942-4281
bfogel@naco.org

Tony Giancola
Executive Director
National Association of County Engineers
440 1st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-393-5041
Agiancol@naco.org

Gene Glotzbach
ITS Engineer Administrator, ITS Office
Florida DOT
605 Suwanee Street
MS 90
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
850-410-5616
Fax 850-414-8673
gene.glotzbach@dot.state.fl.us

James Goerke
Interim Executive Director
National Emergency Number Association
P.O. Box 360960
422 Beecher Road, Gahana, OH 43230 Columbus, Ohio 43236
800-332-3911
Fax 614-933-0911
jgoerke@nena9-1-1.org

Christopher J. Hill, Ph.D.
Regional Vice President
National Engineering Technology Corporation
19 East Loudoun Street
P. O. Box 631
Round Hill, VA 20142
540-338-3771
Fax 253-498-7068
chill@nateng.com

Kelly Hutchinson
ITS Operations Engineer
N.C. DOT
2590 Trenton Road
MSC 1533
Raleigh, NC 27699
919-233-9331 x230
Fax 919-852-03480
khutchinson@dot.state.nc.us

Leslie N. Jacobson, P.E.
Western Systems Manager
PB Farradyne Inc.
999 Third Ave.
Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98104-4020
206-382-5290
Fax 206-382-5222
jacobsonl@pbworld.com

Anne Johansen
WorldCom
1594 Nottingham Road
Charleston, WV 25314
anne.johansen@wcom.com

William Jones
Technical Director
U. S. DOT /FHWA
400 7th Street SW
Rm 3416
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-2128
Fax 202-366-3302
william.s.jones@fhwa.dot.gov

Anthony Kane
Director of Engineerting & Technical Services
AASHTO
444 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 429
Washington, DC 20001
202-624-5800
Fax 202-624-5806
akane@aashto.org

Paul Karch
Director, Government Affairs
NetByTel, Inc.
1141 S. Rogers Circle
Suite 9
Boca Raton, FL 33487
800-NETBYTEL
pkarch@netbytel.com

W. Todd Kell
Senior Policy Analyst, ITS Division
Virginia DOT
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23219
804-786-2451
Fax 804-786-9748
William.Kell@VirginiaDOT.org

Joel King
Director of Sales
BeVocal
685 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, California 94043-2213
650.210.8600
Fax 650.210.9275
joel@bevocal.com

Martin C. Knopp
Director, ITS
Utah Dept. of Transportation
Box 148270
4501 South 2700 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-8270
801-965-4894
Fax 801-965-4338
mknopp@dot.state.ut.us

Stephen Kuciemba
Vice President, Technology
ITS America
400 Virginia Avenue, SW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
202-484-4847
Fax 202-484-3483
skuciemba@itsa.org

Patrick Liccardello
Program Manager
Lockheed Martin Corporation
12999 Deer Creek Cannon Road
MS: DC 4350
P.O. Box 179
Littletown, CO 80127-5146
303-971-9482
Fax 303-971-4093
patrick.liccardello@lmco.com

Harry (Mac) Lister
ITS Specialist
U.S. Department of Transportation
Midwest Resource Center
19900 Governors Drive
Olympia Fields, IL 60461
708-283-3532
Fax 708-283-3501
mac.lister@fhwa.dot.gov

David Lively
Senior Transportation Planner
Caltrans, Traffic Operations
1120 N. Street
P.O. Box 942874
MS 36
Sacramento, CA 94274-0001
916-653-4575
Fax 916-654-5423
david_lively@dot.ca.gov

John Lively
Director, Government Relations
Intrado, Inc.
1225 I Street, NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 2005
202-312-2011
Fax 202-785-2649
jlively@intrado.com

Duana Love
Chicago RTA
Program Mgr. Engineering & Technology
Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
181 W. Madison
Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60602
312-917-1563
Fax 312-917-0846
loved@rtachicago.rta.com

Mike Nevarez
Transit Operations Manager
City of Phoenix - Public Transit Department
302 N. First Avenue
Suite 700
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-7303
Fax 602-495-2002
mike.nevarez@phoenix.gov

Dave Nuckols
Area Manager, North Central
Nuance Communications
4441 Hunters Ridge Road
Hopkins, MN 55345
952-935-7879
Fax 952-935-7884
dnuckols@nuance.com

Greg O'Connell
Director, Public Sector Sales
Tellme Networks, Inc.
3 Metro Center
Suite 700
Bethesda, MD 20814
301-941-1853
grego@tellme.com

Leon Osborne
President
Meridian Environmental Technology
P.O. Box 14178
Grand Forks, ND 58208-4178
701-787-6044
leono@meridian-enviro.com

Scott Perley
Associate
Mobility Technologies
851 Duportail Road
Suite 220
Wayne, PA 19087
610-407-3416
Fax 610-725-0530
sperley@traffic.com

James Pol
Transportation Specialist
FHWA
400 7th Street, SW
Room 3416
HOIT-1
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4374
Fax 202-493-2027
james.pol@fhwa.dot.gov

Pierre Pretorius, Vice Chair
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
7600 N. 15th Street
Suite 250
Phoenix, AZ 85020
602-944-5500 X 166
Fax 602-944-7423
ppretorius@kimley-horn.com

Kunwar Rajendra
Engineer of ITS
Bureau of Transportation Planning
Michigan Department of Transportation
425 W. Ottawa St.
P.O. Box 30050
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-2893
Fax 517-373-9255
rajendrak@state.mi.us

Raymond Ruggieri
Business Development Manager
TRANSCOM
Newport Financial Center
111 Pavonia Avenue
6th Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07310-1755
201-963-4033
Fax 201-963-7488
ruggieri@xcm.org

Robert Rupert
Technical Programs Coordinator
FHWA
400 7th Street, SW
HOTM-1
Room 3404
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-2194
Fax 202-366-8712
robert.rupert@FHWA.dot.gov

Louis F. Sanders
APTA
1666 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
202-496-4886
lsanders@apta.com

Rick Schuman
Manager, Traveler Information Systems
PBS&J
482 S. Keller Rd.
Orlando, FL 32810-6101
407-647-7275 x 511
Fax 407-647-4281
rickschuman@pbsj.com

Eli Sherer
Sr. ITS Specialist
PBS&J
443 Bartlett Drive
Madison, CT  06443
(203) 421-7915
Fax (203) 421-7917
elisherer@pbsj.com

Mshadoni Smith
FHWA
400 North 8th Street, Room 750
P. O. Box 10249
Richmond, VA 23240-0249
804-775-3346
Fax 804-775-3356
mshadoni.smith@fhwa.dot.gov

Michael Sobolewski
ITS Planner
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road
B2
Saint Paul, MN 55113
651-582-1602
Fax 651-582-1302
mike.sobolewski@dot.state.mn.us

Kathleen Stein
Principal
Howard Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
38 Chauncy Street
Boston, MA 02111
617-482-7080
Fax 617-482-7417
kstein@hshassoc.com

Jerry Strigari
Dir., Telecom. & Network Planning
New Jersey Transit
One Penn Plaza East
Newark, NJ 07105
973-491-7194
Fax 973-491-8889
jstrigari@NJtransit.com

Rich Taylor
Director, Information Programs
ITS America
400 Virginia Avenue, SW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
202-484-4669
Fax 202-484-3483
rtaylor@itsa.org

Kathy Tell
Assoc. Director - Number Optimization, Business Marketing
SBC/Ameritech
2500 Northwestern Highway
Room A106
Southfield, MI 48075
248-424-2466
kathy.e.tell@msg.ameritech.com

R. Leon Walden, P.E.
Transportation Engineer Specialist
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
State Office Building
501 High Street
Room 741
Frankfort, KY 40622
502-564-4556
Fax 502 564-6640
leon.walden@mail.state.ky.us

Timothy M. Wolfe, P.E.
Assistant State Engineer
Arizona Department of Transportation
2302 W. Durango St.
Mail Drop PM02
Phoenix, AZ 85009-6452
602-255-6622
Fax 602-407-3394
twolfe@dot.state.az.us

James L. Wright, Chair
Orion Project Director
Minnesota DOT
1500 West County Road
B2
Room 121
Roseville, MN 55113
651-582-1349
Fax 651-582-1302
jim.wright@dot.state.mn.us


[1] 90% of the time (21.6 hours of the day, 7884 hours of the year, etc.), a 511 system should have the system capacity to handle 100% of incoming calls. This guideline recognizes that extreme conditions will occur periodically that will increase demand well beyond "normal peak" calling. In those circumstances, it is in not unreasonable to ask callers to re-dial to access the service.