|
1
|
- Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.
- California PATH Program
- University of California, Berkeley
- September 2011
|
|
2
|
- Background behind project creation
- Energy ITS Program in Japan
- European Commission projects
- Contrasts between U.S. and overseas situations
- Recommendations for AERIS activity
|
|
3
|
- Japan’s Energy ITS Program initiated outreach to Europe and U.S. for
research coordination and collaboration on ITS for environment and
energy
- Tokyo, March 2009
- Stockholm, September 2009
- Amsterdam, March 2010
- Tokyo/Busan, October/November 2010
- Vienna, June 2011
- European Commission funded ECOSTAND project as a “coordinating action”,
at €735 K for two years
- U.S. participation has been ad-hoc until now
- With higher levels of activity in the other countries, we need to become
more engaged
|
|
4
|
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), funded at $12 M per
year, 5 years (now at 3.5 years)
- 90% for automated truck platooning
- ** 10% for modeling effects that ITS can have on reducing
transportation CO2 **
- Six working groups, seeking international participants from Europe and
U.S.:
- Defining ITS applications that can reduce CO2
- Traffic simulation modeling
- Emissions modeling
- Probe vehicle monitoring
- Model verification and validation methodology
- International traffic data warehouse
|
|
5
|
- eCoMove - €22.5 M from 2010 – 2013
- Direct successor to CVIS and SAFESPOT
- Diverse cooperative vehicle-related ITS services, for testing on 4 cars
and 2 trucks:
- Eco-driving, freight logistics, route guidance, adaptive cruise
control, transmission shifting control
- Both arterial and freeway traffic control
- In-Time - €4.5 M from 2009-2012
- Multi-modal traffic and traveler information, to encourage mode shifts
- Freilot - €4 M from 2009 -2011
- Freight movement efficiency through eco-driving, logistics, and
improved green wave signal control
|
|
6
|
- CO2 reduction is now the dominant motivation for ITS
projects, ahead of safety and mobility
- €50 M this year for new proposals on low-carbon freight and multi-modal
mobility
- €40 M next year for new proposals on:
- Cooperative systems for low-carbon multi-modal mobility
- European-Wide Service Platform for cooperative systems enabled services
- N.B.: “Green Car” initiative has
already provided €60 M on Information and Communication Technologies
(ICT) for the Fully Electric Vehicle
|
|
7
|
- Increasing urgency now that China is the leading CO2 emitter
- 2020 goal to reduce CO2 by 40-45% per unit GDP from 2005
level
- Policies for low carbon transportation
- Major urban and inter-urban rapid transit expansions
- Subsidies for retiring older high emission vehicles
- ITS research in Ministry of Science and Technology, with indirect link
to environment issues
- Information sharing and connectivity
- Multi-modal efficiency improvements
- Advanced traffic management
|
|
8
|
- Other industrialized countries ratified Kyoto and take its CO2
reduction goals seriously
- Drastic changes needed by 2050
- Nobody has a solution to meet those goals
- CO2 reduction becoming the dominant factor in transport
policy, then reflected in transportation research priorities
- Others investing much more heavily in this than the U.S.
- Primarily research funding from agencies responsible for industrial
competitiveness rather than transportation
|
|
9
|
- Japan wants to define the evaluation metrics and procedures now, so
everybody knows how ITS products will be evaluated for CO2
savings (METI initiative)
- Their approach has serious technical limitations, where we could help
- Japan has invited Europe and the U.S. to collaborate, but we have been
slow to respond
- U.S. needs to get engaged in this, building on our strengths in
transportation planning and operations and emissions modeling
|
|
10
|
- Japan and EC investments in developing target systems dwarf the AERIS budget,
making it hard to be competitive
- Modeling effects of ITS on energy, CO2 and criteria
pollutants is a pre-competitive topic area where we could collaborate
and benefit greatly
- These models are needed to facilitate domestic ITS deployments anyway
- The technical challenges are large enough to need the best
international experts
- ITS has already suffered from lack of adequate models (“Moving Cooler”)
- Data needed from real deployments
|
|
11
|
- Separate approaches, depending on the effects of ITS:
- Reducing demand for vehicle travel à regional transportation planning and travel demand models
- Improving vehicle operational efficiency à microscopic models, with results extrapolated to regional
and national levels
- Improving infrastructure operational efficiency à newer integrated
models needed, incorporating driver behavior and traffic phenomena
- Separate short-term latent demand effects from long-term induced demand
effects, based on real data rather than ideology
|