Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Engaging the International Community:
Research on ITS Applications to Improve
Environmental Performance
  • Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.
  • California PATH Program
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • September 2011
2
Outline
  • Background behind project creation
  • Energy ITS Program in Japan
  • European Commission projects
  • Contrasts between U.S. and overseas situations
  • Recommendations for AERIS activity
3
Project Background
  • Japan’s Energy ITS Program initiated outreach to Europe and U.S. for research coordination and collaboration on ITS for environment and energy
    • Tokyo, March 2009
    • Stockholm, September 2009
    • Amsterdam, March 2010
    • Tokyo/Busan, October/November 2010
    • Vienna, June 2011
  • European Commission funded ECOSTAND project as a “coordinating action”, at €735 K for two years


  • U.S. participation has been ad-hoc until now


  • With higher levels of activity in the other countries, we need to become more engaged
4
Japan’s Energy ITS Program
  • Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), funded at $12 M per year, 5 years (now at 3.5 years)
    • 90% for automated truck platooning
    • ** 10% for modeling effects that ITS can have on reducing transportation CO2 **

  • Six working groups, seeking international participants from Europe and U.S.:
    • Defining ITS applications that can reduce CO2
    • Traffic simulation modeling
    • Emissions modeling
    • Probe vehicle monitoring
    • Model verification and validation methodology
    • International traffic data warehouse
5
Most Relevant Current EC Projects
  • eCoMove - €22.5 M from 2010 – 2013
    • Direct successor to CVIS and SAFESPOT
    • Diverse cooperative vehicle-related ITS services, for testing on 4 cars and 2 trucks:
      • Eco-driving, freight logistics, route guidance, adaptive cruise control, transmission shifting control
      • Both arterial and freeway traffic control

  • In-Time - €4.5 M from 2009-2012
    • Multi-modal traffic and traveler information, to encourage mode shifts

  • Freilot - €4 M from 2009 -2011
    • Freight movement efficiency through eco-driving, logistics, and improved green wave signal control
6
Newer EC Initiatives on ITS for the Environment
  • CO2 reduction is now the dominant motivation for ITS projects, ahead of safety and mobility


  • €50 M this year for new proposals on low-carbon freight and multi-modal mobility


  • €40 M next year for new proposals on:
    • Cooperative systems for low-carbon multi-modal mobility
    • European-Wide Service Platform for cooperative systems enabled services

  • N.B.:  “Green Car” initiative has already provided €60 M on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for the Fully Electric Vehicle
7
Activities in China on ITS for the Environment
  • Increasing urgency now that China is the leading CO2 emitter
    • 2020 goal to reduce CO2 by 40-45% per unit GDP from 2005 level

  • Policies for low carbon transportation
    • Major urban and inter-urban rapid transit expansions
    • Subsidies for retiring older high emission vehicles

  • ITS research in Ministry of Science and Technology, with indirect link to environment issues
    • Information sharing and connectivity
    • Multi-modal efficiency improvements
    • Advanced traffic management
8
Overseas Perspectives
  • Other industrialized countries ratified Kyoto and take its CO2 reduction goals seriously
    • Drastic changes needed by 2050
    • Nobody has a solution to meet those goals

  • CO2 reduction becoming the dominant factor in transport policy, then reflected in transportation research priorities


  • Others investing much more heavily in this than the U.S.


  • Primarily research funding from agencies responsible for industrial competitiveness rather than transportation
9
Immediate Imperatives Relative to Japan’s Energy ITS Initiative
  • Japan wants to define the evaluation metrics and procedures now, so everybody knows how ITS products will be evaluated for CO2 savings  (METI initiative)
    • Their approach has serious technical limitations, where we could help

  • Japan has invited Europe and the U.S. to collaborate, but we have been slow to respond


  • U.S. needs to get engaged in this, building on our strengths in transportation planning and operations and emissions modeling
10
Broader Implications for AERIS
  • Japan and EC investments in developing target systems dwarf the AERIS budget, making it hard to be competitive


  • Modeling effects of ITS on energy, CO2 and criteria pollutants is a pre-competitive topic area where we could collaborate and benefit greatly
    • These models are needed to facilitate domestic ITS deployments anyway
    • The technical challenges are large enough to need the best international experts
    • ITS has already suffered from lack of adequate models (“Moving Cooler”)
    • Data needed from real deployments
11
Model Development and Validation Needs
  • Separate approaches, depending on the effects of ITS:
    • Reducing demand for vehicle travel à regional transportation planning and travel demand models
    • Improving vehicle operational efficiency à microscopic models, with results extrapolated to regional and national levels
    • Improving infrastructure operational efficiency à  newer integrated models needed, incorporating driver behavior and traffic phenomena

  • Separate short-term latent demand effects from long-term induced demand effects, based on real data rather than ideology