Integrated Corridor Management
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative

Slide 1. Integrated Corridor Management Initiative

ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas
Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management

Slide 2. Background

  • Currently surface transportation systems are made up of several independent networks
    • Freeways, including managed lanes
    • Arterials
    • Bus Routes
    • Rail Transit
  • In reality each of these networks is made up of high volume links
  • These parallel network links overlay to form transportation corridors
  • Metropolitan areas contain several major corridors

Slide 3. Opportunity

  • Efforts to date to "reduce congestion" have focused on optimization of individual networks
  • No capability to respond to demand from other networks
  • Integration across networks is critical in these high demand corridors
  • Corridors offer an opportunity to operate and optimize the entire system as opposed to the individual networks

Slide 4. Integrated Corridor Management Systems: Examples

  • Traffic signal systems that respond to large diversions of traffic from clogged freeways
  • Demand responsive ramp metering systems integrated with local traffic signals
  • Adaptive bus prioritization that responds to increased bus traffic during special events
  • Traveler information systems that estimate and predict congestion over time and balance demand on networks

Slide 5. Goals

  • Provide guidance to assist agencies in implementing Integrated Corridor Operations
  • Create supporting analysis tools, approaches, and technical standards
  • Demonstrate the value of Integrated Corridor Management

Slide 6. Milestone/End Product

  • Widespread Integrated Corridor Operations, resulting in:
    • Efficient use of available network capacity
    • Reduced congestion and delays
    • More reliable travel

Slide 7: Detailed Roadmap

Integrated Corridor Management Roadmap

Image Details

Slide 8: Program Plan/Approach

  • The Initiative consists of four phases
    • Phase 1: Foundational Research
    • Phase 2: Operations and Systems Development
    • Phase 3: Model Deployment
    • Phase 4: Knowledge and Technology Transfer
  • Duration of Initiative
    • FY04–FY10

Slide 9. Phase 1: Foundational Research

  • Goal 1: Engage Multimodal Stakeholder Working Group
    • Action
      • Candidate Model Deployment Sites will form core group
  • Goal 2: Foundational Integration Studies
    • Actions
      • Define Corridor Concept of Operations
      • Document Successful Local Integration Efforts
      • Identify Corridor Types and Operational Approaches
      • Identify Operational Strategies and Analysis Tools
      • Identify Functional Requirements
  • Decision Point #1 – August 2005
    • Did we identify sufficient integration issues?
    • Are the issues workable?

Slide 10. Phase 2: Operations and Systems Development

  • Goal 1:Organizational Integration
    • Action
      • Develop cross network management systems that support distribution of responsibilities and sharing of control
  • Goal 2: Operational Integration
    • Action
      • Develop cross network operational strategies and analysis tools
  • Goal 3: Technical Integration
    • Action
      • Develop interfaces and integrated procedure to facilitate operational strategies, i.e. device-to-device integration
  • Decision Point #2 – Sept. 2007
    • Do we have the knowledge and capabilities to support an effective model deployment?

Slide 11. Phase 3: Model Deployment

  • Goal 1: Pre-Model Deployment Activity
    • Actions
      • Pre-Model Deployment Workshop
        • Prep for Candidate Sites
      • Candidate Model Deployment Sites Selection
        • Form core of stakeholder group
        • Detailed examination of specific issues and problems
  • Goal 2: Model Deployment
    • Actions
      • Site selection and Implementation
      • Apply integration techniques in real world setting
      • Model Deployment Evaluation

Slide 12. Phase 4: Knowledge and Technology Transfer

  • Goal 1: Pre-Model Deployment Knowledge and Technology Transfer
    • Action
      • Support Candidate Sites preparing for Model Deployment
  • Goal 2: Integrated Corridor Management Outreach, and Knowledge and Technology Transfer
    • Action
      • Produce detailed Integrated Corridor Management implementation guidance to ensure areas with interest in deployment have the information and technology they need
      • Includes management systems, operational strategies, tools, technology transfer, standards, and training

Slide 13. Summary

  • Congestion is complex
  • Corridor Management can make a difference
  • Significant integration challenges must be addressed
  • Opportunity to enhance our capabilities and improve performance

Additional ITS Resources on the Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations Website




RITA's privacy policies and procedures do not necessarily apply to external web sites.
We suggest contacting these sites directly for information on their data collection and distribution policies.