 |
|
|
|
Magazine Article
| Title |
Abstract |
How to Use |
Useful to |
| Integrated Corridor Management – Historic Sites Article |
This article was published in the June 2009 issue of Thinking Highways. It provides background information on the Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative’s 8 Pioneer Sites (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD) and discusses the four phases of the ICM Initiative. This article also summarizes the Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) methodology that the ICM Core Team developed. The team tested the methodology and validated it through the use of a Test Corridor similar to the Pioneer Sites’ corridors. This article also discusses the benefits of ICM that were identified through the testing of AMS strategies on the Test Corridor. Lastly, the article informs readers about the three sites chosen for AMS testing (Dallas, TX, San Diego, CA, and Minneapolis, MN) and the next steps for the ICM Initiative. |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative and to learn more about the four phases of the ICM Initiative, the AMS testing methodology and results from the Test Corridor, and the next steps for the ICM Initiative. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about ICM and its successes; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the ICM Initiative. |
| Integrated Corridor Management Analysis, Modeling and Simulation Article |
This article was published in the May 2009 issue of Horizons. It provides information on the 8 Pioneer Sites chosen in 2006 by the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD).The article summarizes the goals of the Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) phase of the Initiative and the preliminary results from the AMS of the Test Corridor. The article also summarizes three preliminary benefits of ICM that were quantified through this phase of the Initiative. Lastly, the article discusses the three sites chosen for AMS testing (Dallas, TX, San Diego, CA, and Minneapolis, MN). |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative, to learn more about the AMS testing methodology and results from the Test Corridor, and to learn about the next steps for the 3 AMS Pioneer Sites. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about the ICM Initiative’s AMS methodology and Test Corridor results; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the AMS methodology and Test Corridor results. |
| Integrated Approach: Analysis, Modeling and Simulation Results for the ICM Test Corridor Article |
This article was published in the February 2009 Traffic Technology International Traffic Annual Showcase magazine. It provides background information on the Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative’s 8 Pioneer Sites (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD). This article discusses the principles of the Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) methodology developed for the Test Corridor, the modeling approach used along the corridor, tools and procedures for various operating conditions, and the specific ICM strategies that were examined along the Test Corridor. The article summarizes the results from the AMS of the Test Corridor, describes the performance measures used to quantify the benefits of ICM, and describes the benefits of ICM determined through the AMS. Lastly, the article informs readers about the three sites chosen for AMS testing (Dallas, TX, San Diego, CA, and Minneapolis, MN) and the next steps for the ICM Initiative. |
This article serves as a detailed overview of the AMS of the Test Corridor performed as part of Phase 2 of the ICM Initiative. Readers can learn more about the principles of AMS, the methodology used along the Test Corridor, and the results of the testing. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about the ICM Initiative’s AMS methodology and test corridor results; Transportation practitioners looking to learn about AMS principles, methodology, and results. |
| Integrated Corridor Management Article |
This article was published (in Spanish) in the October 2008 issue of Andina Traffic. It provides and overview of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative. The article discusses the four phases of the ICM Initiative and defines ICM and other terms used in the Initiative. The article provides information about the 8 Pioneer Sites chosen in 2006 by the ICM Initiative (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD). This article also summarizes the Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) methodology that the ICM Core Team developed and validated on the Test Corridor. Lastly, the article informs readers about the three sites chosen for AMS testing (Dallas, TX, San Diego, CA, and Minneapolis, MN) and the next steps for the ICM Initiative. |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative, to learn more about the AMS testing methodology and results from the Test Corridor, and to learn about the next steps for the 3 AMS Pioneer Sites. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about the ICM Initiative; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the AMS methodology and Test Corridor results. |
| Integrated Corridor Management: Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) Results for the Test Corridor Article |
This article was published in the September 2008 issue of Mass Transit. It provides information on the 8 Pioneer Sites chosen in 2006 by the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD).The article provides an overview of the Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) principles and methodology. The article also discusses the validation of the AMS methodology through the application of AMS on the Test Corridor. The article describes the simulation models used in AMS and how these models characterize the corridor. The article discusses the preliminary results from the AMS on the Test Corridor, the preliminary benefits of ICM that were quantified through this phase of the Initiative, and the performance measures used to quantify the benefits of ICM on the Test Corridor. Lastly, the article discusses the three sites chosen for AMS testing (Dallas, TX, San Diego, CA, and Minneapolis, MN) and the next steps for the ICM Initiative. |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative, to learn more about the AMS testing methodology and results from the Test Corridor, and to learn about the next steps for the 3 AMS Pioneer Sites. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about the ICM Initiative’s AMS methodology and Test Corridor results; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the AMS methodology and Test Corridor results. |
| Managing Congestion with Integrated Corridor Management Article |
This article was published in the May 2008 issue of Mass Transit. It provides background information on the Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Initiative. It also discusses the objectives of the ICM Initiative and the four phases of the Initiative. The article also summarizes the connection between ICM and public transit and shows how these two systems can work together to balance traffic demand during normal operating conditions and shift the capacity burden during accidents or construction. The article also provides descriptions of each of the 8 Pioneer Sites (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD). |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative and to learn more about the four phases of the ICM Initiative, the 8 Pioneer Sites, and the connection between ICM and public transit. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about the ICM Initiative; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the ICM Initiative and the Pioneer Sites. |
| Integrated Corridor Management Article |
This article was published in the May 2008 issue of the ITE Journal. This article defines Integrated Corridor Management (ICM), provides a business case for ICM, and describes the objectives of the Initiative. It explains the difference between ICM and traditional approaches to transportation management. It provides background information on the ICM Initiative’s 8 Pioneer Sites (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD) and discusses in detail the four phases of the ICM Initiative. The article also introduces the ICM Knowledgebase and its capabilities. |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative and to learn more about the ICM Initiative, the objectives of the Initiative, the four phases of the ICM Initiative, and the 8 Pioneer Sites. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about ICM and its successes; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the ICM Initiative. |
| Integrated Corridor Management – Historic Sites Article |
This article was published in the March 2008 issue of the Public Roads. This article defines Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) and describes the objectives of the ICM Initiative. It explains the difference between ICM and traditional approaches to transportation management. It provides background information on the ICM Initiative’s 8 Pioneer Sites (the sites are: Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA, Oakland, CA, Minneapolis, MN, Seattle, WA, and Montgomery County, MD). The article also explains the four phases of the ICM Initiative and how the phases will involve the Pioneer Sites. Lastly, the article introduces the ICM Knowledgebase and its capabilities. |
This article can be used to raise awareness about the ICM Initiative and to learn more about the ICM Initiative, the objectives of the Initiative, the four phases of the ICM Initiative, and the 8 Pioneer Sites. |
Transportation and public affairs/marketing professionals at all levels (Federal, State and local) seeking to raise awareness in their area or organization about ICM and its successes; General public, public officials, and others who would like to learn more about the ICM Initiative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
