|
|
|
|
Key Message:
|
|
Time on Slide:
|
|
Suggest
Comments:
|
|
Tables-based DSS
Systems (e.g. Toronto COMPASS, Georgia NaviGAtor, etc.). These technologies and/or methodologies are
data tables with predefined response plan recommendations and require little
to no processing, modeling or analysis.
Some may include basic logic to analyze data in the tables while
others are purely lookup tables.
|
|
Knowledge-Driven
DSS, which includes:
|
|
Expert System DSS
Systems (Caltrans ATMS, KC Scout, St Louis Gateway Guide, etc.). This DSS requires an expert system engine
to generate recommendations for response plans based on a set of pre-defined
rules.
|
|
Custom Rules-based
DSS Systems (ODOT Transport, GDOT NaviGAtor I, PACE TODSS). Similar to the Expert System DSS, the
Custom Rules DSS uses specific rules to determine response plans. The difference is that the rules are custom
built rather than having an expert system engine.
|
|
Event Scenario
Matrix (Lake County Passage, Michigan ATMS, New Jersey ATMS, etc.). Planned or unplanned events are identified
on the roadway using map coordinates such as latitude/longitude or another
plane coordinate systems and users are able to respond to the events using
the predefined ITS field devices along the roadway.
|
|
Model-Driven DSS
which incorporate on-line simulation tool integration (Singapore Green LInk
DEtermination (GLIDE) Traffic Control System, Madrid, Beijing, Milan).
|
|
Transit Operations
Decision Support Systems (TODSS), Core Requirements Prototype Development
Case Study, 2010 FTA-IL-26-7009-2009.1
|
|
Data Driven DSS,
which is a form of support system that will focus on the provision of
internal and sometimes external data to aid in the decision making. Sometimes this comes in the form of a data
warehouse, e.g. a database designed to store data in such a way as to allow
for its querying and analysis by users.
|
|
Hybrids of the
above.
|
|
Assessment of
Emerging Opportunities for Real-Time, Multimodal Decision Support Systems in
Transportation Operations. Concept
Definition and Current Practice Report. Science Applications
International Corporation, report No FHWA
|
|
|