|
1
|
- Safety Program Workshop
- Northbrook, Illinois
- July 21, 2010
- Suzanne Sloan
- U.S. DOT / Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
|
|
2
|
- Top-Down:
- Policy Roadmap (version 8), December 2009
- Cross-cutting policy constructs focused on deployment
- Bottom-Up:
- Specific technical policy issues focused on supporting ongoing research
and major research milestones
- Deconstruct technical research roadmaps
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Purpose:
- Outline policy and institutional issues in an organized, structured
manner.
- Develop plan for research and analysis that results in options and
recommendations in support of V2V and V2I for Safety.
- Research results and decision points are driven by:
- Safety Pilot
- The 2013 NHTSA regulatory decision
- Deployment
- Organization:
- Key policy questions
- Specific research tasks
- Stakeholder collaboration
- Stakeholder outreach/education
- Outcomes for major program milestones
- Timeline
|
|
5
|
- Identified 8 key policy issue areas in collaboration with technical team
and stakeholders:
- Device and Equipment Certification
- Certificate Authority for Security
- Risk Allocation and Data Ownership
- Benefit-Cost Analysis in Support of Deployment
- Rules of Operation and Application of Standards
- Spectrum Analysis and FCC Role
- Infrastructure and Deployment
- Governance Structure and Authority
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Definition
- Certification provides a process that ensures all devices and equipment
part of the IntelliDrive system meet specific standards relating to
interoperability and performance, security, and privacy.
- Objectives
- Define interoperability
- Identify risks and threats that can be addressed through certification
versus those that need to be addressed by a governance authority
- Develop policies based on certification processes and management
structure
- Evaluate types of impacts the certification process may have on
industry or consumers due to access restrictions, costs, or other
factors
- Analyze whether self-certification could be an option
|
|
8
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot
- Initial recommendations on ways of identifying misbehavior and
options for enforcement
- Model certification process to be evaluated during Safety Pilot
- Evaluation of performance, costs, etc.
- Stakeholder review
- Analysis of lessons learned and gaps
- Where is further work needed? How will model process expand to
include other elements?
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision
- Analysis of industry impact
- Tested certification process that includes recommendations on
certifying entities, roles, and responsibilities
- Deployment
- Operational certification and enforcement processes
- Identified laboratories/facilities able to certify devices and
equipment
- Guidance and training process for agency personnel
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Definition
- An entity or process for issuing digital certificates that confirm or
validate a person, vehicle, organization, and other entity looking to
access the system is legitimate. A certificate authority (CA) structure
is necessary to provide security and privacy protection.
- Objectives
- Assist the technical team in CA design and address questions regarding
a “centralized” or “split” CA through a trade-off analysis
- Engage privacy advocates to understand acceptable levels of privacy
and gain their ‘buy-in’ to understand impacts on cost, scalability and
deployment
- Analyze the trade-offs between security and privacy of the system
- Identify how misbehavior can be addressed and what enforcement
mechanisms are feasible
|
|
12
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot
- Concept of Operations for a CA
- Initial CA design for testing during Safety Pilot including processes
for certificate management, issuance, updates, identification of
misbehavior, enforcement options, revocation, reinstatement
- Understanding of trade-off issues between security, privacy, and cost
- Evaluation of impact to existing privacy principles
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision
- Feasible CA design and certificate management process with
appropriate security and privacy levels
- Identification of additional authorities needed for a CA entity (if
any)
- Assessment of privacy issues
- Deployment
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Definition
- Allocation of legal risk and liability between participants of the
IntelliDrive system. Cooperative data systems complicate the existing
definitions of risk allocation, liability, and data ownership.
- Objectives
- Develop definitions of ‘risk’ and ‘data ownership’ from the
perspective of cooperative systems and multi-source data
environments**
- Identify risk/liability associated with software failures, driver
behavior (failure to heed warnings), or negligence (updates, failure
to use)
- Engage legal expertise to determine current legal precedence and
review existing laws on immunity
- Identify impacts to business and risk models, particularly insurance
industry models
- Engage insurance industry and gain acceptance
- Engage insurance industry on opportunities for incentives with use
of cooperative systems for safety
- ** This policy area has overlapping issues with the Data Capture and
Management Program.
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Definition
- Analysis examining all associated ‘costs’ and ‘benefits’ for deployment
of IntelliDrive in support of decision making. Benefit-cost analysis
(BCA) is necessary for making a regulatory decision and is an important
tool for understanding the “value” of IntelliDrive to different
audiences.
- Objectives
- Develop a vehicle fleet model that includes revised assumptions
including a retrofit perspective and current sales projections
- Identify the stakeholder impact/value proposition (e.g. OEMs, State
and local transportation agencies, transit agencies, trucking
companies……who else?)
- Perform various analyses on IntelliDrive:
- Value propositions
- Safety-benefit estimation
- Costs identification
- Cost-effectiveness and alternatives analysis for applications
- Societal benefits / BCA
|
|
20
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot
- Identification of data required for all of the various analyses and
identification of which data will be generated from Safety Pilot and
which data will be gathered from other sources
- Development of value propositions
- Analysis plan
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision:
- NHTSA safety benefits-estimation, cost-effectiveness and alternatives
analysis as inputs for decision
- Economic / industry / agency impact analysis
- Deployment
- Societal benefits evaluation
- Understanding of potential costs
- Benefits presented for investment decision-making
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Definitions
- IntelliDrive Safety will include certain types of infrastructure for
both V2V and V2I. Infrastructure here refers to roadside equipment
(RSE), back office systems, and the maintenance and operations
activities required to implement them – for safety. From a policy perspective, issues
regarding infrastructure can be similar to other ITS infrastructure
issues but may be tailored to meet the needs of a multi-jurisdictional
IntelliDrive system.
- Objectives
- Identify minimum level of infrastructure for maximum public benefit
and develop deployment guidance:
- Workforce needs for deployment, operations, and maintenance
- Procurement guidance
- Integration with existing systems, upgrade, maintenance, and other
procedures
- Options for financing, deployment, and operations of infrastructure
- State and local public sector roles versus private sector roles
- Identify costs and financing/funding incentives for deployment
|
|
24
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot:
- Preliminary configuration of roadside infrastructure for testing
certificate authentication
- Preliminary configuration of roadside infrastructure for testing
Safety applications
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision and for Deployment:
- Recommendations and input on minimum level of roadside infrastructure
necessary to support V2V
- Synergies with potential FHWA Policy decision
- Deployment:
- Guidance on funding, deployment, and maintenance options for roadside
infrastructure
- Training for deployers, operators, and technicians
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Definition
- Rules of operation and standards provide the nationwide system of
IntelliDrive with consistency and interoperability. They outline common
standards by which participants of the system must adhere and identify
use and enforcement within the context of federal, state, and local
laws.
- Objectives
- Assess who the system users are and identify their requirements
- Identify existing laws and variations in their application around the
Nation
- Define policies and procedures for rules of use, standards,
operations, maintenance, and upgrades
- Identify costs and institutional issues
- Define enforcement options, decision making processes, and oversight
requirements
- Identify potential entities for decision-making, oversight, dispute
resolution, and enforcement
|
|
28
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot
- Using ConOps, develop operational scenarios and define
decision-making entities and test preliminary rules of operations – who
makes what decisions, when, about what?
- Develop series of security scenarios for introduction into Safety
Pilot to test select enforcement techniques
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision
- Recommended rules of operation and standards for input into NHTSA
decision
- Deployment
- Rules of operations and standards for deployment – guidance documents
and training
- Recommended plan for standards harmonization
- Recommended enforcement mechanisms and analysis
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Definitions
- The 5.9GHz space of the communications spectrum that would be used by
IntelliDrive is subject to regulations and oversight provided by the
FCC. It is necessary to understand the current rules of the spectrum,
how they impact industry, and whether/how these rules work for the
proposed IntelliDrive system.
- Objectives
- Understand existing rules and procedures and determine whether changes
are needed in support of IntelliDrive.
- Identify whether V2V and V2I will require the use of a “spectrum
manager” and whether this is possible under the current rules.
- Need to work with the FCC on issues such as interference, enforcement,
channel switching, valid use, and other issues.
- Identify how this area of the spectrum might be leveraged for
commercial purposes once Safety is appropriately addressed.
|
|
32
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot
- Understanding of allowable uses and governance of the 5.9 Ghz
spectrum
- Appropriate licensing for Safety Pilot testing
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision and for Deployment:
- Recommendation on potential design of roles and responsibilities for
IntelliDrive spectrum management (and whether the IntelliDrive goals
could be achieved in the absence of a spectrum manager).
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Definitions
- A governance structure defines the type and level of authorities needed
for deployment, system operations, and enforcement, and defines the
roles and responsibilities of the players engaged in the system.
- Objectives
- Identify governance structures from other industries and apply lessons
learned to IntelliDrive
- Design a governance framework
- Define roles and responsibilities
- Aggregate results of other policy areas into the framework
- Identify whether new legislation or authorities are needed and by whom
- Identify impacts
|
|
36
|
- Expected Outcomes
- Safety Pilot:
- Concept of Operations for IntelliDrive system and evaluation of what
potentially requires governance
- Preliminary identification of what can be governed through standards
versus what requires a governance entity(ies)
- NHTSA Regulatory Decision:
- Recommended governance structure in support of safety, outlining
suggested roles and responsibilities
- Deployment:
- Recommended governance entity with associated operations, roles and
responsibilities
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|