|
1
|
- Valerie Briggs
- Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy
- ITS Joint Program Office
- Research and Innovative Technology Administration
- April 19, 2012
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Determine if V2V (and V2I/V2X) is feasible to implement
- Security Needs
- Functional Requirements
- Physical/Technical Requirements
- Operational & Organizational Requirements
- Financial Sustainability and Responsibility
- Challenges – unique –
- Potentially mandatory systems
- Trip anonymity
- Scalability, etc.
|
|
9
|
- Clarifications
- Security Network – credentialing and certificate management
- Security Back Office – operational functions that apply across any type
of Security Network
- Applications Infrastructure – Infrastructure specifically for V2I safety
(DSRC) or V2I mobility (other options)
- All require sustainable funding
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Very fast moving
- Growth in consumer connectivity and the world of apps
- Emerging market “ecosystem” for apps, suppliers and, perhaps, OEMs
- Trend toward cell connection and apps in vehicles
|
|
14
|
- Understand and document suitable security approaches
- Understand costs
- Identify potentially viable paths for implementation
- Identify potentially sustainable financial models for supporting needs
- Understand potential risks and ramifications
- Understand stakeholder impacts, roles and responsibilities and support
needs
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Transportation safety is the DOT’s top priority.
- The principles require that the system:
- Prevent or mitigate the severity of crashes
- Minimize driver workload
- Ensure no increase to driver distraction
- Encompass all road users
- Ensure that mandatory safety applications cannot be turned off or
overridden.
- Uses beyond safety applications are permissible and encouraged as long
as they do not detract from safety.
|
|
19
|
- The system is extensible to all types of connected vehicle systems and
applications (safety, mobility, environmental, etc.).
- System implementation must be national in scale and extensible across
North America.
- Implementation can start at discrete locations but is envisioned to
include all major roadways with timing to coincide with the roll out of
technology in vehicles.
|
|
20
|
- DOT is committed to fostering a connected vehicle environment that
ensures stakeholder and operational needs are met while at the same time
protecting consumers appropriately from unwarranted privacy risks.
- The connected vehicle environment will incorporate appropriate
privacy controls: transparency; individual participation and redress;
purpose specification; limitations on use of information; data
minimization and retention; data quality and integrity; security; and
accountability and auditing. For example:
- The environment must provide consumers with appropriate advance notice
of and, for opt-in systems, opportunity to provide consent for
information collection, use, access, maintenance, security and disposal.
- The environment will limit the collection and retention of personally
identifiable information to the minimum necessary to support
stakeholder and operational needs.
|
|
21
|
- As the federal role and other critical aspects of connected vehicle
regulation and/or implementation are further defined, DOT will document
publicly the privacy risks and controls applicable to the system and
users.
- The system must be secure to an appropriate level. The system will:
- Ensure secure and trusted information exchange among users
- Provide protection from hacking and malicious behavior
- Maintain data integrity.
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Functionality of the system requires compliance with nationwide,
universally accepted non-proprietary communication and performance
standards
- Interoperability of equipment, vehicles, and other devices is necessary
to enable mandatory safety applications as well as applications
supporting mobility, economic competitiveness, and sustainability.
- Standards must be maintained to ensure technical viability.
- The system must be technically adaptable and viable over time
- Must be backward compatible.
- System must be able to evolve over time as new technologies become available.
|
|
26
|
- Communication technology for safety applications must be secure, low
latency, mature, stable, and work at highway speeds.
- Currently DSRC is the only known viable technology for safety critical applications.
- DSRC or other communication technologies could be used for safety
applications that are not for crash-imminent situations, mobility, and
environmental applications.
- Use of the spectrum must comply with established requirements for non-interference.
- Safety applications take priority over non safety applications.
- Public sector applications take precedence over commercial applications.
|
|
27
|
|