Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Commercial Vehicle
Driver Acceptance Clinics
  • Alrik L. Svenson
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


  • ITS Workshop on Connected Vehicles
  • Moving from Research towards Implementation
  • Chicago, IL
  • September 25, 2012
2
Outline
  • Heavy Truck V2V Safety Research
  • Connected Commercial Vehicle Project
  • Commercial Vehicle Driver Acceptance Clinics (CV DAC)



3
Heavy Truck V2V Safety Research Overview
  • Objective: Resolve technical issues necessary for deployment of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) systems on commercial vehicles (CV) in support of NHTSA 2013/14 decisions.
  • Connected Commercial Vehicle Team Led by Battelle (CCV-IT)
  • Develop V2V safety applications on a heavy truck platform
  • Build Heavy Truck Tractors with integrated V2V (3 - Freightliner Class 8 Tractors) for:
      • CV Driver Acceptance Clinics
      • Participation in Model Deployment
      • Safety Application performance testing by U.S. DOT
4
Connected Commercial Vehicle Project Team
5
 Integrated Truck Architecture
6
Integrated Heavy Truck Installations
7
CV Driver Acceptance Clinics (CV DAC)
  • Evaluate Driver Acceptance of V2V Applications in Heavy Trucks
      • Surveys and direct observation of driver responses to warnings
      • Recruited drivers with valid CDL from local fleets and independents
      • In-depth interviews of drivers
      • Participants are paid for their time
    • Coordinated with the Light Vehicle Clinics and Volpe Independent Evaluator
8
 CV DAC Scenarios
  • IMA:  Stopped HV Enters Intersection with RV Approaching
  • FCW: HV Encounters Stopped RV in Same Lane
  • EEBL: HV Approaches Decelerating RV with an Obstructing Vehicle
  • BSW/LCW:  RV in the Blind Zone
  • BSW/LCW:  HV Attempts a Lane Change, RV Is in the Blind Zone


9
Intersection Movement Assist (IMA)
10
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)
11
Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL)
12
Blind Spot/Lane Change Warning (BSW/LCW)
13
CV DAC Preliminary Demographics
14
CV DAC Preliminary Results
  • Acceptance was nearly universal
    • From the written questionnaires:
      • “Must have”
      • “The technology was excellent.”
      •  “Very, very good thing.  No unexpected rear end [crash].”
    • From the interviews:
      • “At last”  or   “About time”
      • “Audio [warning] more important than visual [warning]”
        • “Want eyes out the window”
        • “Want informative sounds, not just beeps”
      • “Want different sensitivity for city, rural, fog, ice”
15
CV DAC Preliminary Results (Cont.)
    • Cautions From Truck Drivers
      • “If it’s annoying, it will be disconnected” [by truck drivers].
      • “Experienced drivers will use their mirrors and not the BSW”
      • “This will become a crutch for light vehicle drivers”
    • Suggestions From Truck Drivers
      • Warn of motorcycles between the lanes in California
      • Deal with the daily fog in the Bay Area
      • “Look around the corners of stacked containers at the Port of Oakland”

16
Contact Information
  • Alrik Svenson
  • Research Engineer / Program Manager
    • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    • 202-366-0436
    • Alrik.Svenson@dot.gov