|
1
|
- Connected Vehicle Policy Program
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Four scenarios:
- Mostly cellular system
- Mostly cellular with some installation of DSRC RSE
- “All DSRC”
- CAMP Phased Deployment Scenarios
- Three principal cost drivers:
- On-Board Equipment (OBE) is a significant in-vehicle cost in all
scenarios
- Road-Side Equipment (RSE) is a significant infrastructure cost in an
“All DSRC” scenario
- Cellular may be a significant cost in those scenarios that rely on it
for certificate delivery
|
|
6
|
- Delivery of the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) is expensive and
technically demanding
- With incremental or no CRL delivery:
- Certificate Authority maintains CRL, but does not distribute. Instead,
certificates are withheld from misbehaving vehicles.
- Cellular data costs drop substantially.
- With no CRL distribution, OBE costs are the most expensive part of the
system:
- OBE costs vary slightly for each scenario due to cost and power
consumption of subcomponents
- OBEs are necessary for safety, so the incremental costs to serve the
function of communicating to the SCMS are relatively small
- Results are very sensitive to inputs; uncertainty in conclusions is
high
|
|
7
|
- For an “All DSRC” scenario, the number of RSEs nationwide depends on
risk tolerance and coverage requirements:
- Estimates vary from 1300 RSEs to150,000 RSEs
- Unanswered Questions:
- What level of coverage is acceptable?
- How frequently must a vehicle interact with the system?
- Lowest cost scenario hinges on number of RSEs required
- Cellular scenarios are lowest cost if “All DSRC” requires many RSE
- OBE costs become most important if “All DSRC” requires fewer RSE
|
|
8
|
- Operational issues and unknown variables dramatically impact costs of
cellular options
- Cellular scenario highly sensitive to changes in the misbehavior rate,
CRL variable data size, and peak prices
- Installation, operation and maintenance of RSE’s pose significant
challenges for DRSC options
- Placement of RSE’s in state or locally owned equipment cabinets and
rights-of-way would require a significant implementation permitting,
coordination and system integration effort
- Placement of RSE on private property may be an alternative but would
also require a strategy for implementation
|
|
9
|
- Business Models
- Infrastructure Analysis - AASHTO
- Spectrum
- Core System Architecture Analysis
- Standards and Certification Needs Identification
|
|
10
|
- NHTSA has authority to support:
- Key aspects of V2V communications
- Regulation of critical equipment, messages and applications if related
to safety
- Provision of the security required to support a V2V rule by a
non-Federal entity, as through a procurement or other form of agreement
or indirectly via a V2V regulation
- FHWA does not have authority to require installation of roadside
infrastructure
|
|
11
|
- Intellectual Property
- Privacy
- Need to distinguish between trip-trackability and ability to identify
bad actors on the system
- DOT will do comprehensive review of any final system and involve
appropriate privacy community
|