‹#›
September 25, 2012
Risk Analysis
•Risk analysis was performed for various attack/attacker combinations and scenarios. Analysis done for 24 attacks, 11 attackers, and 3 scenarios, so overall a total of 792 risk assessments.
•
•Expert judgment and a NIST-like model were used to find likelihood and impact levels, and finally risk levels.
•Risk levels are low, medium and high. A high risk level may, for example, mean frequent false warnings that may deter user acceptance.
•Assuming connectivity only every 3 years, Sybil attacks on the OBEs in the full deployment model showed up as high risk.
•This risk can be mitigated by having more frequent connectivity. Connectivity requirements analysis results are on the next slide.