|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Measure performance of crash avoidance applications
- Does application operate as prototype design intent
- Acceptable for Model Deployment (Warning)
- Characterize performance for simulation
- Warning and extended prototype to support benefit estimation
- Forward Crash Avoidance and Intersection Crash Avoidance
- Safety Application Performance (Objective Tests)
- Interoperability
- Ensures devices can communicate with other devices
- Form, transmit, receive, and process BSM
- Assess compliance with device specifications
- Device Certification
|
|
13
|
- Procedure Requirements
- Testing Approach
- Countermeasure Modality Requirements
- Objective Test Run Validity Criteria
- Instrumentation, Equipment Installation, Calibration
- Data Collection Requirements
- Environmental, Ambient, and Standard Test Conditions
- Suspension Criteria
- Safety Protocols
- Crash Imminent Test Scenarios
- No-Action Test Scenarios
|
|
14
|
- Junction Crossing Intersection Collision Avoidance
- Rear End Forward Collision Avoidance
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Position displacement
- Offset strike-able ‘boom’
|
|
18
|
- Examining use of a surrogate
remote vehicles for use in Intersection Collision Avoidance testing.
|