Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Moving From Research to Implementation
AASHTO Perspective
  • AASHTO Deployment Coalition
  • September 26th, 2012
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


2
Agenda
  • State Pooled Fund Implementation Activities
  • AASHTO Outreach Activities
  • National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Analysis
  • Summary
3
Pooled Fund
  • Partnership with FHWA and the DMA program
    • Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System
      • Intelligent Traffic Signal System
      • Transit Signal Priority
      • Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System
      • Emergency Vehicle Preemption
      •  Freight Signal Priority
  • Arizona and California Sites


4
NCHRP 03-101
  • Costs and benefits of Connected Vehicle infrastructure deployment by state and local agencies
  • Emphasis on direct benefits (cost savings) to agencies, rather than broader societal benefits
  • Focus on case study-based analyses in several representative states
    • Virginia case study underway
  • Results due early 2013
    • Initial findings presented at Nov 19th ELT Meeting
  • DSRC State Guidance
    • Provide state of readiness and licensing strategies
5
Outreach Activities
  • Operations Committee (SSOM)
    • Connected Vehicle an emphasis area
    • Colorado DOT Director spearheading
  • ITS World Congress
    • 7 state DOT directors; President, Vice President, past presidents, large states CA, FL, MI



  • Administration Committee
    • NHTSA legal & State legal
  • Traffic Engineering Committee Taskforce
    • Establish awareness of the C.V. world
    • Resolution to support implementation
  • Communications Committee
    • State DOT communications directors
    • Establish awareness
    • Solicit their resources to spread the word



6
Where is AASHTO today?
  • Our future vehicle world – we can begin to see it now; consequently we:
    • Need clarification of the opportunities and obligations there are for the states
    • Need to start engaging more of the state and local agency decision makers in a deployment discussion.

7
National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis
  • Preliminary concept for field infrastructure deployed by state & local agencies
    • Could be used by private consortia to design, build, operate, finance
  • Compelling justification of agency value
  • Provide tools for engaging state agencies
  • Bring into focus applications that are of the greatest value to agencies
8
National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis
  • Set of design concepts with high-level engineering detail
  • Define set of deployment scenarios and
    • How, where and when they can be deployed..
    • How they might be paid for..
    • Extrapolated to a national footprint…
    • Phased deployment plan…
    • Define national support needed…
9
Task 3 - Technical Memo for State and Local Participants
  • Level of understanding varies dramatically across the nation’s state and local DOTs; consequently, we want to send them an alert:
    • Why infrastructure deployment is beneficial
    • What will deployment look like and when does it need to accomplished
    • A successful transportation future will require a commitment to deployment
    • Describe the concept in compelling terms and what they should be doing to prepare
10
Task 4 - Applications Analysis
  • Effective deployment plan relies on understanding capital, operations, maintenance needs for each application or bundle (i.e. safety/mobility)
  • Applications have different set of requirements for processing, data, communications, security, power and installation requirements
  • The data needs of each application will be described and gaps addressed
  • Table prepared with applications inventory, data requirements, communication options and infrastructure needs à Task 5



11
Task 5 - Design Concepts and Security & Architecture Gaps
    • Use Task 4 output to create real-world design concepts with high-level engineering detail
    • Location types – urban, rural, speed zones, intermodal, border crossings, more…..
    • Readiness tiers – technical vs. institutional
12
Task 6 - Preliminary National Infrastructure Footprint and Phased Deployment Plan
  • One of the most significant challenges is lack of a clear description and extent of field infrastructure - impediment to action
  • Development of set of deployment scenarios
    • Design concepts
    • Funding strategies
    • Challenges
    • Timeline


13
Task 6 contd.
  • Development of preliminary footprint
    • Work with states within AASHTO Deployment Coalition ~ case study approach
    • Develop extrapolation process to reach a national footprint
  • Development coordinated phase deployment plan
    • Establish approach for nationwide roll-out
    • Processes, stakeholders, policies, institutional issues
14
Task 6 contd.
  • Develop estimates of capital investment requirements and ongoing operational costs
    • Design
    • Procurements
    • Communications and backhaul
    • Installation
    • Operations and maintenance
    • Staff development
15
Task 7 – Final Report
  • Final report incorporating the findings from Task 3 – 6 and presenting a national connected vehicle field infrastructure footprint and coordinated phased deployment plan
16
The Team
17
Schedule
  • Task 3 delivery - 80 days after Notice to Proceed (NTP)
  • Task 4 delivery – input into Task 5
  • Task 5 delivery – draft 120 days after NTP
  • Task 6 delivery – draft 190 days after NTP
  • Task 7 delivery – draft final report 330 days after NTP
18
Summary
  • AASHTO working to keep pace with NHTSA Decision!
  • Nov 19th ELT Meeting at AASHTO’s Annual meeting
    • NCHRP 03-101
    • Infrastructure Analysis outline
    • Others from USDOT, VIIC