|
1
|
- AASHTO Deployment Coalition
- September 26th, 2012
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
|
|
2
|
- State Pooled Fund Implementation Activities
- AASHTO Outreach Activities
- National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Analysis
- Summary
|
|
3
|
- Partnership with FHWA and the DMA program
- Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System
- Intelligent Traffic Signal System
- Transit Signal Priority
- Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System
- Emergency Vehicle Preemption
- Freight Signal Priority
- Arizona and California Sites
|
|
4
|
- Costs and benefits of Connected Vehicle infrastructure deployment by
state and local agencies
- Emphasis on direct benefits (cost savings) to agencies, rather than
broader societal benefits
- Focus on case study-based analyses in several representative states
- Virginia case study underway
- Results due early 2013
- Initial findings presented at Nov 19th ELT Meeting
- DSRC State Guidance
- Provide state of readiness and licensing strategies
|
|
5
|
- Operations Committee (SSOM)
- Connected Vehicle an emphasis area
- Colorado DOT Director spearheading
- ITS World Congress
- 7 state DOT directors; President, Vice President, past presidents,
large states CA, FL, MI
- Administration Committee
- NHTSA legal & State legal
- Traffic Engineering Committee Taskforce
- Establish awareness of the C.V. world
- Resolution to support implementation
- Communications Committee
- State DOT communications directors
- Establish awareness
- Solicit their resources to spread the word
|
|
6
|
- Our future vehicle world – we can begin to see it now; consequently we:
- Need clarification of the opportunities and obligations there are for
the states
- Need to start engaging more of the state and local agency decision
makers in a deployment discussion.
|
|
7
|
- Preliminary concept for field infrastructure deployed by state &
local agencies
- Could be used by private consortia to design, build, operate, finance
- Compelling justification of agency value
- Provide tools for engaging state agencies
- Bring into focus applications that are of the greatest value to agencies
|
|
8
|
- Set of design concepts with high-level engineering detail
- Define set of deployment scenarios and
- How, where and when they can be deployed..
- How they might be paid for..
- Extrapolated to a national footprint…
- Phased deployment plan…
- Define national support needed…
|
|
9
|
- Level of understanding varies dramatically across the nation’s state and
local DOTs; consequently, we want to send them an alert:
- Why infrastructure deployment is beneficial
- What will deployment look like and when does it need to accomplished
- A successful transportation future will require a commitment to
deployment
- Describe the concept in compelling terms and what they should be doing
to prepare
|
|
10
|
- Effective deployment plan relies on understanding capital, operations,
maintenance needs for each application or bundle (i.e. safety/mobility)
- Applications have different set of requirements for processing, data,
communications, security, power and installation requirements
- The data needs of each application will be described and gaps addressed
- Table prepared with applications inventory, data requirements,
communication options and infrastructure needs à Task 5
|
|
11
|
- Use Task 4 output to create real-world design concepts with high-level
engineering detail
- Location types – urban, rural, speed zones, intermodal, border
crossings, more…..
- Readiness tiers – technical vs. institutional
|
|
12
|
- One of the most significant challenges is lack of a clear description
and extent of field infrastructure - impediment to action
- Development of set of deployment scenarios
- Design concepts
- Funding strategies
- Challenges
- Timeline
|
|
13
|
- Development of preliminary footprint
- Work with states within AASHTO Deployment Coalition ~ case study
approach
- Develop extrapolation process to reach a national footprint
- Development coordinated phase deployment plan
- Establish approach for nationwide roll-out
- Processes, stakeholders, policies, institutional issues
|
|
14
|
- Develop estimates of capital investment requirements and ongoing
operational costs
- Design
- Procurements
- Communications and backhaul
- Installation
- Operations and maintenance
- Staff development
|
|
15
|
- Final report incorporating the findings from Task 3 – 6 and presenting a
national connected vehicle field infrastructure footprint and
coordinated phased deployment plan
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Task 3 delivery - 80 days after Notice to Proceed (NTP)
- Task 4 delivery – input into Task 5
- Task 5 delivery – draft 120 days after NTP
- Task 6 delivery – draft 190 days after NTP
- Task 7 delivery – draft final report 330 days after NTP
|
|
18
|
- AASHTO working to keep pace with NHTSA Decision!
- Nov 19th ELT Meeting at AASHTO’s Annual meeting
- NCHRP 03-101
- Infrastructure Analysis outline
- Others from USDOT, VIIC
|