|
1
|
- Kate Hartman
- September 26, 2012
|
|
2
|
- SRI Background and Governing Efforts
- SRI Vision and Goals
- Project Team
- Technical Approach
- SRI Concept
- Task Detail: Task 5.1-5.2
- High-Level Project Schedule
- Completed, Current and Upcoming Activities
|
|
3
|
- What is Smart Roadside?
- A joint modal initiative between Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
and Federal Motor Carrier Administration (FMCSA).
- Focus: the development of roadside infrastructure for commercial
vehicle operations that employs technologies for information sharing.
- USDOT vision: demonstrate, evaluate, and deploy interoperable
technology and improved data sharing to improve safety, security,
operational efficiency, and mobility on the Nation's freight
transportation system.
- Related Research:
- Wireless Roadside Inspection Program
- Universal Identification for CMVs
- Electronic Screening/Virtual Weigh Stations
- Truck Parking Program
|
|
4
|
- USDOT ITS Strategic Research Plan, 2010-2014; defines the strategic
direction for the USDOT's ITS research program for the next five years.
- Emphasis: connected vehicle technologies and applications that uses
wireless communications to provide connectivity with and between
vehicles; between vehicles and roadway infrastructure; and among
vehicles, infrastructure and wireless consumer devices.
- Areas: safety, mobility, environment
- SRI represents research to improve safety and mobility of commercial
vehicle operations.
- V2I:
- Investigate key questions such as are vehicle based safety applications
using V2I communications effective and do they have benefits
- SRI represents mode-specific research in this area with regards to
commercial vehicles.
|
|
5
|
- Vision:
- Commercial vehicles, motor carriers, enforcement resources, highway
facilities, intermodal facilities, toll facilities, and other nodes on
the transportation system collect data for their own purposes and share
the data seamlessly with the relevant parties, in order to improve
motor carrier safety, security, operational efficiency, and freight
mobility.
- Goals:
- Build, install and test prototype of Smart Roadside Application(s)
- Enable data exchange between vehicle and roadside infrastructures which
connect to authoritative databases for information and relevant data.
|
|
6
|
- USDOT: ITS JPO, FHWA, FMCSA:
- SAIC
- Prime Contractor
- Lead: project management, systems engineering, and prototype design,
development, build, install and test
- North Dakota State’s Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute (UGPTI)
- Led applications analysis of deployed systems
- Subject Matter Expertise for design
- American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI)
- Led applications analysis of research projects
- Technical advisor to project team representing the trucking industry
- Delcan Corporation
- Led the development of the SRI Concept of Operations
- Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA)
- Technical advisor to project team representing the commercial vehicle
enforcement community
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Elements
- Users: Industry and government users that would access the various
capabilities delivered through the system
- User Interface Applications: Mechanisms by which users would request and
receive information and forward instructions
- External System Interfaces:
Linkages with the business and government systems that are needed to
gain access to data and disseminate information
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Identifies current system and shortcomings
- Future system concept and capabilities:
- Identifying Entities on the Road
- Sharing Information—establishing a common framework
- Enhanced Electronic Screening—attended and unattended
- Integrating Public- and Private-Sector Data
- Streamlined/Accelerated Inspections—Wireless Roadside Inspections and
traditional inspections
- Performance-Based Standards and an Architecture
- Scenarios:
- Compliant CMV (“Green Light”)
- Compliant CMV – Os/Ow permit verification
- Non-compliant CMV (“Red Light”)
- Non-compliant CMV – illegal bypass
- Real-time truck parking information system
|
|
12
|
- Kickoff in May 2012
- Prototype Design, Build and Install:
- System Requirements
- Architecture
- Component Level Design
- Prototype Development and Test
- Build and Install Prototype
- Prototype Field Testing
- Documentation
|
|
13
|
- Candidates
- Alberta, Canada
- Colorado
- Maine
- Michigan
- Connected Vehicle Test Bed
- Minnesota
- North Dakota
- New Jersey
- Pennsylvania
- Tennessee
- Florida
- Process
- Survey Distribution (50 states)
- Inventory of current physical infrastructure, IT tools, communications
infrastructure, physical layout and hardware.
- Evaluation of available infrastructure, availability for participation
|
|
14
|
- Draft submission to USDOT – 8/10/12
- USDOT comments: 8/31/12
- Revision: 9/18/12
- Walkthrough: tentative early October
- Final SyRS: 10/29/12 or sooner
- IEEE 1233 compliant
|
|
15
|
- Traceability:
- Unique identifier
- Source
- Verification method:
- Test
- Analysis
- Demonstration
- Inspection
- Demonstration Location:
- Michigan and/or Colorado
- Future Site
- Categories:
- System
- Interface
- Application
- Performance
- Security
- Additional Content:
- Physical Requirements:
- Environmental
- Construction
- Durability/Adaptability
- Data Requirements
- System Operations Specifications
|
|
16
|
- Draft submission to USDOT – 8/10/12
- USDOT comments: 8/31/12
- Revision: 9/18/12
- Walkthrough: tentative early October
- Final SAD: 10/29/12 or sooner
- Sources:
- Architecture Description Document, Version 1.1, 11/26/07 (Software
Engineering Institute)
- IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of
Software-Intensive Systems (IEEE Std 1471-2000)
|
|
17
|
- Architecture decisions
- Operational and logical views
- Operational elements
- Software components
- Information exchanges
- System views:
- Components and relationships
- Technical views and technologies
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Project Management Plan
- Systems Engineering Master Schedule
- Systems Engineering Management Plan
- Configuration Management Plan
- Task 2-3 Tech Memo 1: Documentation Review
- Task 2-3 Tech Memo 2: User Needs
- Task 2-3 Tech Memo 3: Prioritization of Applications
- Task 4: Draft ConOps
- Task 4: ConOps Walkthroughs
- Stakeholder Engagement:
- Reviews of user needs, operational policies, operational constraints
|
|
21
|
- Current Activities
- Scheduling and preparing SyRS and SAD walkthroughs
- Upcoming Activities:
- SyRS and SAD walkthroughs
- SyRS and SAD Final versions
- Kickoff SRI system design
|
|
22
|
|