|
1
|
- Volker Fessmann
- Federal Highway Administration
- Chicago Safety Workshop
- September 26, 2012
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Enables three capabilities not resident in systems today:
- Secure exchange of trusted data between users and applications without
pre-existing relationship or entering into a permanent relationship.
- Assurance of privacy between users and from third parties.
- More efficient data collection from various sources and distribution to
many users.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Can request any data without having a relationship to the data provider
– no need for existing contracts or agreements
- Data is readily accessible and trusted from multiple sources; rapid
access in real-time; and of consistent format/quality.
- Capabilities with a core system:
- Separate agreements to access data from organizations
- Applications navigate to organizations individually to find accessible
data—slow
- Island solutions – no easy data exchange
- Gains still possible but some capabilities and functionalities will
remain out of reach
- Today’s capabilities:
|
|
6
|
- Development of policy options:
- What is the role of a core system in supporting a connected vehicle
environment? Is it necessary or
optional?
- What are the costs? Risks? Opportunities?
- Will devices, applications, equipment need to be certified to connect
with the core? Do specific
standards apply?
- Who will certify that a system meets the requirements to be a core
system?
- Business Case research questions:
- Why would any organization want to implement a core system or procure
core system services?
- Can organizations leverage their systems and equipment?
- Do elements/functions of a core need to remain separate?
- What is the costs/impact of implementing a core?
|
|
7
|
- How do we implement the core system concept with connected vehicle
environment deployers and users?
- Need to develop a more in-depth understanding of:
- Why needed
- How to implement
- Resources needed for implementation
- Need to develop policy for use
|
|
8
|
- Research Actions:
- Using the System Architecture Documents, develop three case studies/
business models for implementing a core system:
- A consortium of public sector entities within a region
- A private sector, data provider firm
- A national trucking/logistics company
- Hypothesis: These three case
studies are likely to apply the SAD differently and have different
needs for core system functionality.
Case Studies will:
- Identify the needed core system functions from each perspective
- Identify the resource gap—what is needed for: costs,
workforce/personnel, organizational changes (if any), or other
institutional requirements
|
|
9
|
- Fall of 2012:
- Apply system architecture to three organizational/business models
- Study gap in institutional resources
- Early 2013:
- Engage stakeholders for review and feedback on case studies
- Finalize case studies and develop policy options
- Relationship to other activities:
- Will inform and be informed by Connected Vehicle Reference
Implementation Architecture effort (Fall 2012-June 2013)
- Certification needs and policy option development (Fall 2012-Early
2013)
|