|
|
|
Risks
|
|
Achieving full
value, particularly at border crossings, will require working out agreements
between States, State regional organizations, Canada and Mexico.
|
|
Institutional risks
will be greater than technical risks.
For example, not all regional partners cooperating in mutual data
exchange, having differing credentialing standards, or not coming online in
the same time frame delaying full benefit to the entire corridor.
|
|
|
|
Other
Considerations
|
|
Owner/Operator
versus Participator
|
|
Participating in a
Core System, already in place by a State DOT for example, will ensure trusted
communications and privacy of the data exchanged. Both State enforcement agencies and private
trucking companies benefit.
|
|
|
|
Operating a Core
System would be of value to a trucking company that wants a higher level of
proprietary processing of the data exchanged with its vehicles. That might also be the best way to
guarantee the kind of regional or national coverage it needs rather than
relying on many States and localities.
|
|
A State enforcement
agency might want to establish a Core System if the state DOT has not done
so. Otherwise, it might be best served
by using that Core.
|