|
|
|
Value/Why Would
Stakeholder Shift to Using a Core?
|
|
Better real-time
management of facilities and incident response.
|
|
Real-time
condition-based congestion pricing.
|
|
To expand road
pricing to more roads at low cost.
|
|
|
|
Alternatives to
Using a Core System
|
|
Proprietary systems
like EZPASS. Though often regional,
these systems would not provide national coverage like that possible with the
connected vehicle environment.
|
|
|
|
Fixed signs, some
Changeable Message Signs, and sometimes Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) provide
messaging to drivers. The in-vehicle
messaging of connected vehicle drastically increases the coverage area for
communicating with vehicles while allowing real-time messaging that can be
unique to individual vehicles. Drivers
can learn what they need more safely and sooner while approaching toll
plazas. Drivers can receive lane
closure or diversion messages before encountering an incident or even before
approaching the toll road.
|
|
|
