|
1
|
- Bob Rupert
- Federal Highway Administration
- Office of Operations
- Mobility and Environment Workshop
- Arlington, Virginia
- November 30, 2010
|
|
2
|
- Application Concepts
- Breakout Exercises: Ground Rules
and Background
- Role of Stakeholder Input
- Breakout Group Organization
- Questions
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Goal
- Identify, with help of stakeholders, collection of applications for
development and testing in Phase 2 of Program
- Approach
- Solicit ideas for transformative applications that improve decision
making by system managers and users
- Initial request closed on 31 July; second call closed 15 October
- More than 90 submittals received
- Summaries are available on the web:
- Thank you to everyone who took the time to submit an idea
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- For today’s exercise, these items can’t be changed
- Evaluation criteria
- Data Environment assumptions
- Application concepts (no altering or adding new ones)
- Policy-related issues are NOT in play for discussion
- Intellectual Property, Privacy, Access/Security, Meta-data, Quality,
Aggregation, Standards, Financial/Business Models….
- If these topics come up, we will park the discussion until tomorrow,
when we have special session to deal with these in turn
|
|
9
|
- Feedback materials provided in the breakout rooms
- Application scorecards
- 3 poker chips (for voting)
- Facilitators will brief assumptions about the data environment that
applications can draw upon
- Facilitators will clarify application evaluation criteria
- Consider a set of (up to 12) IntelliDrive application concepts
- Facilitators provide one slide that describes the application
- Field questions and clarifying discussion
- Individually, you rate the application (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW) against the
criteria on your scorecard
|
|
10
|
- Once you have scored each application, each participant votes for the
three most promising applications
- “Most promising”: strong potential for transformative impact, low
deployment risk, and clear alignment with IntelliDrive program
objectives
- BLUE = 3 points (top priority)
- RED = 2 points (second-highest priority)
- WHITE = 1 point (third-highest priority)
- Deposit your chips in the voting bins identified for each
application
(also turn in your scorecards)
- Quick break (5 minutes) to tabulate the results
- Reconvene to consider results within each breakout
- Discuss the implications of your group process
- Identify a presenter from your group for the breakout report at 3 PM
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Prioritization Criteria
- Potential for transformative impact
- Makes use of IntelliDrive data
- Significant stakeholder interest
- Your input from this workshop is one measure of stakeholder interest
- We have conducted similar exercises with several stakeholder groups
- Can evolve from near-term state to long-term state
- Potential to be released as open source
- Cross-modal impact
- The program cannot fund every idea
- Exercises as a part of this workshop inform the federal team
understanding of each application, but do not determine application
priority
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Today’s Breakouts organized around data environments, applications
assigned to each breakout are listed in your participant resource
booklet
- Arterial (Breakout Room 317)
- Freeway (Breakout Room 332)
- Corridor (Breakout Room 330)
- Regional (Breakout Room 331)
- Please attend only one breakout each day, exercises are conducted in
parallel
- Tomorrow morning’s breakouts features a different exercise and are
organized around primary impact
- Environmental (Breakout Room 332)
- Productivity (Breakout Room 317)
- Mobility (Breakout Room 330)
- Safety and Security (Breakout Room 331)
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|