Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 Applications and Impacts Breakout
Group III: Mobility
2
Transformative
Mobility Impacts
3
Today’s Exercise
(Part 1) Measuring Impact
  • Feedback materials
    • Application scorecard
    • 3 poker chips (for voting)
  • Facilitators preview overall exercise
  • Facilitators lead group discussion on measuring transformative impact
    • Three example measures given
    • Participants may suggest others
    • Simple hand-count voting to determine up to three to be further explored
  • Flip-chart exercise (group discussion)
    • Measure definition and current baseline (if known)
    • What change represents transformative impact?
4
Today’s Exercise
(Part 2) High Impact Apps
  • As we did yesterday, consider up to 10 applications in each impact area
    • One slide per concept, brief clarifying discussion
    • Record High-Medium-Low rating on your scorecard for each of the measures
  • 3-2-1 Poker chip voting for the applications most likely to have transformative impact (per your measures)
  • Facilitated discussion about the application with the highest vote total
    • Identify key data, communications and research needs for this application
    • How close to transformative will this application get us?
  • Repeat facilitated discussion for second highest ranked application
    (time permitting)
  • Reconvene to consider results within each breakout
    • Discuss the implications of your group process
    • Identify a presenter from your group for the breakout report at 11 AM
5
Exercise Ground Rules
  • For today’s exercise, these items can’t be changed
    • Breakout group impact area definitions
    • No adding new application concepts
  • Data environment assumptions from yesterday can be relaxed, however
    • Assumptions about what data is available can be tailored in this exercise
  • Policy-related issues are NOT in play for discussion
    • Intellectual Property, Privacy, Access/Security, Meta-data, Quality, Aggregation, Standards, Financial/Business Models….
    • If these topics come up, we will park the discussion until this afternoon, when we have special session to deal with these in turn
6
 
7
Mobility
 Impact Measures
8
 
9
Application Evaluation Criteria
  • Next, we’re going to go through application concepts that address the mobility impact area
  • We will present each concept on a single slide
    • You can ask clarifying questions, or offer suggestions about how data might be leveraged
    • But the concept itself cannot be altered, modified or enhanced in discussion
  • Record an notes/comments on each application with an assessment on your scorecard for each criteria (High-Medium-Low)
    • Let’s fill in our selected measures now on your scorecard
  • Consider how you will vote for the applications with the most potential to achieve our transformative targets
    • What applications have the most potential to help us reach our transformative target by 2025?
10
Application #1:
ATIS
  • Multi-modal Real-Time Traveler Information
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Improve precision and accuracy traveler information with respect to travel times, cost, or availability on alternate routes or modes
  • Description
    • Considers real-time and historical travel conditions for the traveler’s trip (pre-specified origin, destination, and time of departure)
    • Suggests potential routes and modes (e.g., HOV, transit, tolled lanes) with travel times, travel time reliability, and costs for each alternative
    • Predicts travel times based on existing and expected traffic patterns, weather conditions, incident locations, and work zone locations and timings


11
Application #2:
ICM
  • IntelliDrive-Driven Integrated Corridor Management
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Incompatible operational and data collection procedures limit coordination among freeway, signal system, and transit system operators in a corridor
  • Description
    • Aggregate, consolidate and exchange data on alternate routes and modes to provide true corridor-wide traveler information services
    • Enable traffic management and transit agencies to coordinate their existing systems to improve corridor performance
    • Support integrated and coordinated response during major incidents and emergencies within corridor boundaries


12
Application #3:
CURB-PKG
  • Curbside Parking Availability System
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Inform drivers about the availability of curbside parking, reducing congestion, emissions, and driver frustration
  • Description
    • Monitor curbside parking availability either by using fixed sensors installed in parking meters or the road surface, or by a network of connected vehicles
    • Parking data relayed to a central manager for processing and broadcast
    • Inform travelers in real time the availability of parking spaces, the rate, type, and hours via the internet as well as mobile and in-vehicle devices


13
Application #4:
D-RIDE
  • Dynamic Ridesharing
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Logistical constraints of traditional carpooling (e.g., long-term commitments, fixed schedules, and communication difficulties) prevent ridesharing from realizing its full potential
  • Description
    • Leverage in-vehicle and hand-held devices to allow ride-matching
    • Integrate carpooling functions into vehicle computer and displays, use voice activated ridesharing technology to reduce distraction effects
    • Vehicle-data integration utilized by HOV/HOT enforcement agencies to verify vehicle occupancy


14
Application #5:
DRG
  • Dynamic Routing of Vehicles
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Improve awareness of the best route to destinations, reducing delays.  For emergency responders, delays translate into loss of lives.
  • Description
    • Provide in-vehicle route guidance to road users, including private vehicle drivers, freight shippers, and emergency responders
    • Specifically address the integration of IntelliDrive data and in-vehicle navigation systems
    • Route guidance based on current and predicted conditions


15
Application #6:
GSP
  • General Road User Traffic Signal Priority
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Give priority to general road users at urban intersections for a fee, resulting in reduced delays and increased travel time reliability
  • Description
    • Subscribers can receive signal priority (like transit signal priority)
    • Application will facilitate vehicle progression along the facility
    • Service subscriptions would be based on specific routes/corridors and/or times of day
    • Generate revenue on traditionally non-revenue generating roadways


16
Application #7:
TSP
  • Transit Signal Priority
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Due to a limited ability to make accurate predictions, traditional methods have resulted in poorly performing TSP schemes
  • Description
    • Enable earlier detection of buses, and more accurate and continuous monitoring of the bus as it traverses the corridor
    • Establish low latency and ongoing communications with Priority Request Servers (PRS) at individual, or multiple, intersections
    • Consider new inputs (e.g. passenger loads) and criteria (e.g. type of service, peak direction, etc.) for generating priority requests


17
Application #8:
EFP
  • Multi-modal Integrated Payment System
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Unfamiliarity with fare payment methods and inconvenience are factors that deter some travelers from using transit more often
  • Description
    • Utilize standards for an open architecture electronic payment system
    • Establish a transportation payment environment that reduces delays at toll plazas and parking payment kiosks, and reduces dwell times at bus stops
    • Promote ease of transfers across modes and increase customer convenience
    • Mine trip chaining patterns to improve service planning and operations
    • Support implementation of congestion-based transit fare pricing



18
Application #9:
T-CONNECT
  • Connection Protection
  • Problem Addressed:
    • Missed mode transfers can result in cascading impacts and a substantial increase in travel time, limiting transit attractiveness within a corridor
  • Description
    • Systematically calculate the probability of successful intermodal connections
    • Travelers can initiate requests for connection protection during the trip
    • A centralized system manages these multiple requests and current system status to maximize reliable transit trip making within the corridor
    • Communicate connection protection and schedule changes to travelers


19
Application #10:
WX-INFO
  • Real-Time Route Specific Weather Information for Motorized and Non-Motorized Modes
  • Problem Addressed:
    • improve mobility and safety of users of motorized and non-motorized modes of transportation (e.g., automobiles, transit, freight, bicyclists, and pedestrians) by providing real-time, highly localized weather information
  • Description
    • Fuse weather-related probe data generated by probe vehicles with weather data from traditional weather information sources
    • Develop highly localized weather and pavement conditions for specific roadways, pathways, and bikeways


20
 
21
Breakout Exercise
(Part 2) Voting
  • Now that we’ve worked through all the applications,
    vote for the three most promising applications
    • BLUE = 3 points (top priority)
    • RED = 2 points (second-highest priority)
    • WHITE = 1 point (third-highest priority)
    • Deposit your chips in the voting bins identified for each application
      (also turn in your scorecards)
  • We’ll take a quick break (5 minutes) to tabulate the results
  • One Bin, One Participant, One Chip rule
    • Do NOT dump all of your chips in a single bin
    • We want your individual priority of the top THREE applications
22
 
23
 
24