|
1
|
- Shelley Row
- Director
- Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office
- Research and Innovative Technology Administration, USDOT
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Top level view of the 20-year vision established by planners:
- Implementation of a national ITS Program
- Scope comparable to Interstate Highway System, but major difference –
NOT exclusively a Government program
- Public-private sector partnerships – with major private sector
involvement
- National system of travel support operating mode-to-mode and
state-to-state to promote safe, expeditious, environmentally safe, and
economic movement of people and goods
- A vigorous US ITS industry
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Highlights
- New innovative technology research for transportation
- Organize & categorize functional areas – establish a common language
- Find out what works and what does not work – identify barriers to
deployment
- Operational Tests
- Deployment
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- TEA-21 (July 1998 – September 2005) funded two separate activities:
- ITS Research and Development Program
- Reaffirms Department’s role in advancing research, development and
integrated deployment of ITS
- Creation and testing of vehicle infrastructure integration systems
- Address policy and institutional issues uncovered during ISTEA
- ITS Deployment Program
- ITS Integration Program
- Commercial Vehicle ITS Infrastructure (CVISN) Deployment Program
- Integrated Deployment
- Deployment Earmarks
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Concept of deploying/integrating ITS is portrayed as in the mainstream
of transportation
- Congress enacts Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) – ITS Deployment Program NOT
renewed
- JPO focuses on development of fewer, high-impact, high-value projects to
showcase benefits of ITS.
Connected vehicle emerges as the emphasis.
- ITS Research Program focuses on connected vehicles.
- Modal administrations lead in operations and deployment. ITS is growing
part of “mainstream” programs.
- Connected Vehicle Research
- Performance Management
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- 77% of 117 fixed bus route agencies have AVL & real-time arrival
data in fleets
- 16,000+ fixed route buses equipped with smart card readers
- 451 heavy/rapid rail station equipped with smart cards
- Electronic Toll Collection:
- 99% of Toll plazas
- 94% Toll lanes
|
|
14
|
- 50 states & District of Columbia deployed:
- Safety information exchange
- Electronic credentialing & screening
- 33 states - Exchanging credential data via CVIEW/SAFER
- 28 States - Core CVISN Deployed
- 40 states have electronic screening systems at over 360 weigh stations
with 70,000 participating trucking companies and about 500,000
transponder-equipped trucks
|
|
15
|
- Training – Professional Capacity Building (PCB) will reach 50,000 total
participants this year
- National architecture
- Systems Engineering
- ITS Procurement
- ITS Standards
- ITS JPO participated in the development of 106 published standards
(since 1995)
|
|
16
|
- 266 Operational Traffic Management Centers (TMCs)
- For collection of travel times:
- 7700 freeway miles under surveillance from roadside infrastructure
- 4500 miles under surveillance from vehicle probes
- 54% of all freeways in 75 metro areas are under surveillance
|
|
17
|
- For collection of travel times:
- 2464 arterial miles under surveillance from roadside infrastructure
- 1730 miles under surveillance from vehicle probes
- 50% of intersections in 75 metro are under electronic surveillance
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- 511 coverage for all or parts of 38 states covering 70% of US population
- 36 of 40 metro areas and 58 locations use travel time on DMS
- 109 freeway management agencies report posting traveler information on
DMS
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Sample of companies providing traveler information:
- INRIX
- TrafficLand
- Speed Info
- Navteq
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Functions
- Electronic Stability Control
- Adaptive Cruise Control
- Forward collision warning/avoidance
- Lane departure warning / avoidance
- Blind spot warning / avoidance
- Pedestrian warning / avoidance
- Driver Alert (fatigue)
- Night Vision
- Speed Sign Recognition
|
|
29
|
- Adaptive cruise control
- Forward Collision Mitigation
- Blind spot information system
- Traffic sign recognition
- Lane keeping aid
- Driver alert
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Evaluation includes several factors:
- Technical functionality
- Vehicle-based technology
- Security network and back end functions
- Effectiveness of applications – Safety Pilot
- Cost Effective
- Supportable operationally
- Well managed
- Sustainable financially
|
|
32
|
- Driver clinics
- Large-scale model deployment
- Obtain empirical safety data for estimating safety benefits
|
|
33
|
- Which communications media can support the needs for distributing
security certificates? Choices include:
- Existing Cellular Networks
- Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC)
- WiFi
- No infrastructure option
- All security network options require financing for operational support
- All public – politically feasible?
- Public/private partnership – what type of framework?
- All private – where’s the value?
|
|
34
|
- DARPA – Grand Challenge & Urban Challenge
- Google – 160,000 miles of autonomous operation
- SARTRE: Safe Road Trains for the
Environment
- European project
- Autonomous driving, platooning
- Lead vehicle in platoon human-driven
- Temporary Auto-Pilot
- Volkswagen driving semi-automatically
at 130 kmph
- Within European HAVE-IT project
- VisLab Intercontinental
Autonomous Challenge
- Truck Automation
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- What happened in 20 years?
- Steady progress in advancing ITS technologies:
- $18 billion in ITS deployment by top 75 metro areas
- $3 billion in federal ITS funds
- Deployment happened where local and regional governments had priorities
- Investment happened where cost and perceived value made a case for
deployment
- Fostering a partnership with private sector
- $48 billion U.S. ITS end-use products and services market – ITS
America
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- What happened in 20 years?
- Steady progress in advancing ITS technologies:
- $18 billion in ITS deployment by top 75 metro areas
- $3 billion in federal ITS funds
- Deployment happened where local and regional governments had priorities
- Investment happened where cost and perceived value made a case for
deployment
- Fostering a partnership with private sector
- $48 billion U.S. ITS end-use products and services market – ITS
America
|
|
39
|
|