|
1
|
- Road Weather Mgmt Stakeholder Meetings
- Albuquerque, NM
- September 8, 2011
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Review state-of-the-practice
- Document and quantify benefits of existing WRTM strategies through an
expert panel
- Identify possible improvements
- Develop concept of operations and requirement documents
- Develop procedures of evaluating the benefits or value of improved
strategies
- Conduct a stakeholder workshop for WRTM
|
|
4
|
- Eight categories of WRTM strategies were identified and over 20
strategies described.
- Motorist advisory and alert/warning systems
- Speed management strategies
- Vehicle restriction strategies
- Road restriction strategies
- Traffic signal control strategies
- Traffic incident management
- Personnel/Asset management
- Agency coordination and integration
|
|
5
|
- WRTM strategies tend to be localized.
- Numerous applications exist to deal with certain specific problem
locations/road segments
- Strategies that address regional travel impacts are rare and primarily
exist in the motorist advisory arena
- WRTM strategies use observed weather and traffic condition data
- Very few use forecast data (mainly vehicle/route restrictions)
- Most strategies respond to deteriorating traffic conditions
- Very few proactive WRTM strategies
- Limited documentation of benefits of the WRTM strategies
|
|
6
|
- Dave Kinnecom – Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
- Brian Fariello – Texas DOT (San Antonio)
- Vince Garcia – Wyoming DOT
- Tina Greenfield Huitt – Iowa DOT
- Gene Donaldson – Delaware DOT
- Jack Stickel – Alaska DOT
- Sheldon Drobot – National Center for Atmospheric Research
- Rob Helt – City of Colorado Springs
- Peter Koonce – City of Portland
|
|
7
|
- Improved linkages between weather conditions and traffic operational
impacts
- Detailed guidance on where and when to use active warning systems
- Improved impact prediction and decision support capabilities
- Enhanced weather information integration at TMCs
- Better techniques and tools to facilitate intra- and inter-agency
coordination during weather events
- Improved coordination between transit service providers and traffic
management agencies
|
|
8
|
- Based on the state-of-practice review and the recommended improvements
from expert panel
- Weather Responsive Active Traffic Management – including vehicle,
facility and route restrictions
- Weather Responsive Traffic Signal Management
- Weather Responsive Traveler Information – including both pre-trip and
en-route traveler information
- Seasonal Load Restrictions
- Intra- and Inter-agency coordination
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Objectives: Help TMC’s evaluate their use of Wx information for
operations, identify needs for additional Wx information, and provide
optional strategies for integrating that new information into their
system
- Accomplishments:
- Prepared a State of the Practice
report on TMC Wx Integration
- Developed a Self-Evaluation and
Planning Guide to assist TMCs to identify needs and strategies, and
prepare a plan for Wx integration
- Worked directly with 7 TMCs
across the country to conduct their self-evaluation and
develop/implement Wx integration
plans
|
|
11
|
- Sacramento, California Regional TMC: Implemented and evaluated the
performance of a weather alert notification system
- Kansas City Scout TMC: Integrating weather event forecast information
into their Advanced Traffic
Management System (ATMS)
- Colorado Springs TMC: Conducting a pilot study on winter weather
arterial signal timing in one of their city grids
- Louisiana statewide TMCs: Completed a comprehensive statewide
self-evaluation and integration plan across their four TMCs
- Wyoming Statewide TMC: Expanding road weather information sensor
coverage and implementing additional variable speed limit notification
system in key corridors
- Redding, California TMC: Completed their self-evaluation but resource
limitations prevented them from completing an integration plan
|
|
12
|
- Increased awareness of value of Wx information and preparedness to act
proactively
- More timely dissemination of road weather information to operators and
the traveling public
- Greater Wx information sharing among operators, maintenance,
meteorologists, and external agencies
- Improved operational response to emerging Wx conditions
- Enhanced safety, mobility and satisfaction for travelers (both general
public and commercial)
- Cost savings due to more efficient and effective operational management
of Wx events
|
|
13
|
- Continue to promote guide and assist TMC’s with self-evaluation
- Support TMC’s with implementing integration strategies
- Quantify and document the benefits of weather integration
|
|
14
|
- Roemer Alfelor and David Yang, FHWA
- Deepak Gopalakrishna, Battelle
- Kevin Balke, Texas Transportation Institute
- Chris Cluett, Battelle
- Fred Kitchener, McFarland Management
|