|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Survey
- Background
- Clarus Data Uses
- Access Methods
- Organizational Impact
- New Data Preferences
- Summary
- Next Steps
|
|
3
|
- Conducted by ITSA from 15 June - 15 July 2011
- Intent was to increase understanding of how Clarus is used by system customers
- 28 Participants:
- 13 State DOTs
- 6 private sector companies
- 4 academic institutions
- 3 Federal agencies
- 1 weather service provider
- 1 transit agency
|
|
4
|
- Monitor near real-time weather observations
- 61% use multi-state view
- 54% use in-state view
- Weather model input: 39%
- Evaluating maintenance needs on RWIS: 36%
- Use in other systems (e.g. 511) and weather forecasting: 29%
|
|
5
|
- Map: 48%
- On-demand request: 26%
- Subscription: 22%
- Other: 4%
|
|
6
|
- Significant enhancement: 25%
- “extremely valuable”
- “decreased costs significantly”
- Moderate enhancement: 36%
- “worthy product”
- “working to implement …data”
- No change: 25%
- “Have not used it”
- “Does not apply…”
|
|
7
|
- ASOS/AWOS: 46%
- Other: 20%
- Mobile Data: 81%
- Air Quality: 50%
|
|
8
|
- Survey not extensive but does provide some insight
- Organizational impacts vary considerably
- Clear primary indicators
- State DOTs are primary users
- Main use of data is monitoring current weather
- Map is the main access method
- Mobile data most desired of new sources
|
|
9
|
- Keep Clarus running
- Current plan is through March 2013
- Promote findings from the Regional Demos
- Considering all options for its future:
- NWS MADIS
- And how does this relate to other efforts (e.g., FAA/NWS NextGen
Weather, Nationwide Network of Networks)?
- What’s the link to Connected Vehicle data environments?
- What about other potential homes (academia, private sector,
non-profit)?
|
|
10
|
|