|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Accelerated Development
- Red Light Violation Warning
- Curve Speed Warning
- Stop Sign Gap Assist
- Additional Applications Development
- Stop Sign Violation
- Railroad Crossing Violation Warning
- Spot Weather Impact Warning
- Oversize Vehicle Warning
- Reduced Speed/Work Zone Warning
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Dynamic Eco-Lanes
- Dynamic Eco-Lanes Management
- Eco-Speed Harmonization
- Eco-Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control
- Eco-Ramp Metering
- Dynamic Low Emissions Zones
- Dynamic Emissions Pricing
- Support for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Operations
- Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Charging / Fueling
- Eco-Signal Operations
- Eco-Approach and Departure at Signalized Intersections Eco-Traffic
Signal Timing
- Eco-Traffic Signal Priority
- Eco-Traveler Information
- Dynamic Eco-Routing
- Eco-Smart Parking
- Multi-Modal Traveler Information
|
|
7
|
- Federally funded research will provide open data and open sourced
software for mobility applications
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- 2013 NHTSA agency decision on V2V and V2I safety communications
systems. Options include:
- Future regulatory action
- Inclusion in the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
- Further research and development
|
|
10
|
- 3,000 vehicles (cars, buses, and trucks) equipped with V2V devices.
- Provide data for determining the technologies’ effectiveness at reducing
crashes.
- Includes vehicles with integrated safety applications and others that
use aftermarket devices (i.e., not built into the vehicle)
- Applications to be tested include:
- Blind Spot Warning/Lane Change Warning
- Forward Collision Warning
- Electronic Emergency Brake Lights
- Intersection Movement Assist
- Do Not Pass Warning
- Control Loss Warning
|
|
11
|
- Established in 2009
- Currently involves 10 States, Maricopa County, AZ, Transport Canada –
Virginia is lead State
- Purpose is to aid transportation agencies in justifying and promoting
the deployment of cooperative transportation systems through modeling,
development, engineering, and planning activities
- http://cts.virginia.edu/CTSPFS_1.html
|
|
12
|
- USDOT is working with state and local DOTs and private industry to plan
for deployment
- Standardized interfaces
- Between vehicles
- Between vehicles, roadside, and handheld devices
- Between roadside equipment
- Between roadside equipment and management centers
- Certification processes for equipment and systems
- Nationwide Security Credential Management System (SCMS)
- National Cooperative Highway Research Program (2013 completion)
- Benefit Cost Analysis for state and local DOTs, including funding
options
- DSRC deployment guidance for state DOTs
- National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis
(AASHTO led, 2014 completion)
|
|
13
|
- Comprehensive and detailed study including a set of design concepts with
high level of engineering detail illustrating the relationships between
applications & infrastructure
- Will define set of deployment scenarios
- Will answer:
- Why is a Connected Vehicle field infrastructure needed?
- What form should the field infrastructure take?
- Where is deployment of field infrastructure needed?
- By when should field infrastructure be in place?
- What are the cost, organizational, and institutional implications of
deploying, operating, and managing field infrastructure?
- What are the planning and funding strategies to put the infrastructure
into place in a coordinated manner?
|
|
14
|
- Will provide:
- Preliminary national footprint of connected vehicle field
infrastructure
- Phased deployment plan, along with required actions and funding
strategies
- Cost estimates for deployment, operations, and maintenance.
- Estimates of workforce and training requirements
- Policy and guidance needs.
- Identification of implementation challenges and required timeline for
resolution
|
|
15
|
- System security
- Privacy
- Governance
- Business Models
- Legal Issues
|
|
16
|
- Infrastructure based safety, mobility and environmental applications are
under development
- 2013 is a key decision milestone for vehicle equipage, which will
significantly impact infrastructure deployment
- Key deployment decisions have yet to be made
- USDOT, state and local DOTs, and private industry are working together
to make these decisions and move from research concepts to deployment
|
|
17
|
|