|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Planning started in early 2008
- Inputs gathered from:
- ITS Program Advisory Committee inputs
- USDOT modal staff interviews
- Stakeholder engagement (responded to a RFI)
- Trend analysis:
- Transportation
- World
- Technology
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Focus the program
- Have an overarching direction
- Be vocal
- Put forward a vision
- Engage the community
- Technology is outpacing government research
- Change the game to leverage private sector innovation
|
|
5
|
- Stagnant safety statistics
- Growing congestion
- Growing interest in transit
- Growing environmental awareness
- Emphasis on performance measurement & management
- Troubled transportation financing
- Road pricing and financing alternatives
- Transportation impacts lives
|
|
6
|
- Wireless technology boom
- Strong consumer market
- Fast pace of innovation
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Senior ITS JPO and USDOT multi-modal staffs established vision, mission
& goals: April 2009
- Multi-modal teams formed: April 2009 – May 2009
- Request for Information (RFI) & public workshop for stakeholder
input: May 2009 – June 2009
- Draft ITS research proposals developed: May 2009 – June 2009
- Senior ITS JPO and USDOT multi-modal staffs reviewed & provided
input (down scoped): June 2009
- ITS research proposals revised: July 2009 – August 2009
- Senior ITS JPO and USDOT Multi-modal staffs reviewed revised proposals:
September 2009 – November 2009
- ITS Management Council concurrence: December 2009
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- 38 responses
- Predominantly in agreement with goals and objectives as stated in the
RFI:
- Priority for most respondents is active safety
- Another priority is for large-scale testing and demonstrations as a
means of launching adoption
- Additionally, much interest in the mobility data capture area and
the e-payment areas
- Some common themes:
- Bold, transformative vision is good, but the plan should provide an
incremental approach that can focus and deliver solutions in 5 years
- Consistent support for standards
- Common reference to ITS as a tool for measuring system performance and enhancing
it
- Thoughts provided on new ways to expand partnerships and stakeholder
engagement
|
|
12
|
- Program proposal must support ITS Program goals and objectives
- Focused on large, multi-modal research efforts of national importance
- Federal role must be clear and justifiable
- Expected to offer a positive, measurable return on investment
- Must have champions committed to research success
- Will be a market catalyst
- Must show strong desire for joint funding so that resources can be
leveraged for common purposes
- Must deliver research results in 3-to-5 years, and must be implementable
- Must address institutional, regulatory and policy issues as well as
technology issues
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- IntelliDriveSM is a suite of technologies and applications
that use wireless communications to provide connectivity:
- With and between vehicles (of all types)
- Between vehicles and roadway infrastructure
- Between vehicles, infrastructure and wireless consumer devices
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- PROBLEM
- 37,000 deaths/year (US 2008 data)1
- 5,800,000 crashes/year (US 2008 data)1
- Direct economic cost of $230.6 Billion (US 2000 data)1
- Leading cause of death for ages 4 to 34 (US 2006 data)1
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- OPPORTUNITY
- IntelliDriveSM could potentially address 82% of the vehicle
crash scenarios involving unimpaired drivers
- At full coverage and full effectiveness, IntelliDrive could save
thousands of lives per year
|
|
19
|
- PROBLEM
- Traffic congestion $87.2 billion annual drain on the U.S. economy1:
- 4.2 billion lost hours (one work week for every traveler)1
- 2.8 billion gallons of wasted fuel (three weeks worth of gas for every
traveler)1
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- OPPORTUNITY
- IntelliDriveSM can provide transportation agencies with
- Dramatically improved quality and quantity of real-time transit,
traffic and parking data
- Which would make it easier to manage transportation systems efficiently
- IntelliDriveSM can provide consumers
- Real-time info on modal options
- Real-time info for rerouting
|
|
22
|
- PROBLEM
- 2,800,000 gallons of fuel wasted each year
- 22% CO2 emissions from vehicles
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- OPPORTUNITY
- IntelliDrive can provide transportation agencies with
- Dramatically improved quality and quantity of real-time vehicle (cars,
trucks, transit) and road condition data
- Which would make it easier to manage transportation systems efficiently
for environmental benefit
- IntelliDriveSM can provide consumers:
- Real time info on environmental footprint
- Real time info for rerouting
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Effective Applications
- Interoperable Technology
- Sustainable Approach
- Publicly Acceptable
|
|
31
|
- Are applications available and benefits validated?
- What is the minimum infrastructure needed for the greatest benefit? How
much, where, when and what type?
- What is the degree of market penetration required for effectiveness?
- Is technology stable, reliable, secure, and interoperable?
- Are international standards available to ensure interoperability?
- What policies/governance/funding are required for sustainability?
- How to address public concerns for privacy and ensure that applications
do not cause driver distraction?
|